Re: [Iasa20] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with DISCUSS)

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 04 September 2019 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A7912001A; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 07:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9TdYouTvPTkh; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 07:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EC3E120019; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 07:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x84EIhkd003026; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:18:43 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E694922044; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:18:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF97122042; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:18:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.72.158]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x84EIeTB011743 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:18:41 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Magnus Westerlund'" <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, "'The IESG'" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis@ietf.org>, "'Jon Peterson'" <jon.peterson@team.neustar>, <iasa2-chairs@ietf.org>, <iasa20@ietf.org>
References: <156760606264.22791.12804140363041746046.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156760606264.22791.12804140363041746046.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:18:39 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <027b01d5632b$a6dc59e0$f4950da0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQIwTLQuxVheVBokxSbl2y0d0V+giKZlvNAQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.72.158
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24888.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--7.793-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--7.793-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24888.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--7.792700-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: TmlY9+XBoTnxIbpQ8BhdbE7yqWc5cVLPUb4EdIZGxuC3QzWcbpk4Um4R Zq5Bvfoz5e1nno/rS8AXfYiA4ZuqALzAAqIEqB8323oD4gK8KLohjEPz8ZIh1mz3xnx8b/qRSur 0aj+6gFxcm4Tw3Ne2v/DtvyeHpua3B7MxkEq99T9Q+S0N05fR+/iH64jt3FfEx/58W9GOb2FMk8 QjM8hwMGBqGl3XrwM607VRC++D7/U/XkDzhgPaI7nFs9cSXx1mSMRbDC7vXmy1eX0jEQ9c6sXI1 V9HHghFa41ZsDe8QxM8bGkS8aBQ+G2+XKAi7v+Jqa6SJk58+LbR/CLTQxTQNLqln+jYe7Zh2/9y 9WTpfwDdTAmCcpzVLjKhSPsp3tXQNGiZwMwHmA9VDC2y3ufDjdTupTJjCAw3UnF0DMXqXvuHOAs eoIzKqEH49zRjT+rrfC5tiEWS0QDZbFqeFDx4C0xuvNJjY0Ce0FCm+/lyPSCwuKAMD8Wm9UmuL2 rym0QBQ1hDs0gowvadqC2fLtk9xL9ZdlL8eonaU6baA36eiazEQdG7H66TyMdRT5TQAJnAbRMmT P7eFQgP4y+uOXUSczF4rX4ywhxzssDQhLOwpH2eqD9WtJkSIw==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/EwwJ9Lwu0F_t7Pty2kiyDYP5emY>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:18:52 -0000

Hi Magnus,

Not sure how the authors can address your Discuss.

We were tasked by the WG to produce this document in this form and specifically to not open the existing document even for restrained edits. I think this arose because the WG interpreted its charter very strictly and did not want to risk any other change sneaking in.

It would, of course, be basically simply editorial to revise 7776 and, since that was an AD sponsored piece of work, we could do that instead or as well.

I'm sure the editors remain at the service of the community, but it would be nice to not have to do the work twice.

Best,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>; 
Sent: 04 September 2019 15:08
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;
Cc: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis@ietf.org; Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@team.neustar>;; iasa2-chairs@ietf.org; jon.peterson@team.neustar; iasa20@ietf.org
Subject: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with DISCUSS)

Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't understand why not a replacement for RFC7776 was produced instead of
this soup that is not readable. Publishing this in this form is providing very
mixed messages to the community where we (IESG) apparently are aiming for
readability and ease of comparing older and newer documents, but can't be
bothered to ensure that is produced when it comes to the process documents.
Also RFC 7776 appears to be very self contained and with removal of content
that will be even more true.