Re: [Iasa20] Memo exploring options for IASA 2.0 models

Glenn Deen <rgd.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 17 February 2018 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rgd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A881289B0 for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:42:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.189
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FIN_FREE=2.289, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aJXEhdS2GIOd for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:42:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22b.google.com (mail-pf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05FD7127876 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:42:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 17so663124pfw.11 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:42:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=U4hm87zrWJdFNWTQkb7oQdLR7U4DJiB4PoM2rj+2nlU=; b=O2psoPgyGZ9xc7YbmbX8lgNEAovGuCSNyi+SGPcRXCTQJ1zoypN1qxd8gut8a6Cz4L MYrzmGcTZU01ldf8K6dv39jZjsv7TkVRA9qqOrXtEQ+EmMRtZ9H3H5RSP/4WreNVH3it FPmubEprT2rvawK8aWxZABN3YdiNUSmUkcXJzOJXS+4iGbjUnGJnoKxgGLMU8lPsod5P MiLA+RoQhRa00awG0XzDNcjql7UOUezLrXl6h4QBmofrfXBviv/PYv1sOnw4C6po+Dyf /hYwemIShtyeCJUpbbc9Etykns6/tX4Ic8HHooDiUSOC5dqUdH/wSiMEb7N9OL2UTHki 57Bg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=U4hm87zrWJdFNWTQkb7oQdLR7U4DJiB4PoM2rj+2nlU=; b=Wp/AJyA9QkvWafMMoSh7qO6dun3pQZNhrXAD0Zkt4gRn9KAu9qZdK0qJ8KcIYuJtxI 953sa2sS3LGds3v08/MFFqc6W65jJyseRjoz9SMMG6bO6H3lTTV7AezJV8ZcHFS9Dw6K hUPpG9ZhAcq8dewAYM1y0zT/Pg5B2X2CGHAyQooLi2KnXFoSl+G7Tblrwa0Mk71v/+pf 9RZe01PXTnKnrr3yyw1Fh0/ag8500Co5aOzVu6PyfLFfop854pxXInXMqMuh4K6k6tdo 1Uh+eorg8qWf3b5KMkvROIKcU1wZbFxUfshT5uAxdC2b8hitu+7qsrnxsEwZ0BCCO+mu jPzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBUuTdu2tgGLvBTqXRPQ4dlgZL3twI2ClDEVgnCb/WJK26l/7wr 0ZyRbIIa9BrfldgnWM2gN1HqseaF
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227j2mjRliYvdp9VEmSY+KTvHlk7eX/j4a37JD285Tgxd3+gAh7GeqCMPO0DrYoVT3HoYe89XQ==
X-Received: by 10.167.129.24 with SMTP id b24mr4201919pfi.183.1518900129533; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2605:e000:141b:7a:4537:6946:52f5:6753? ([2605:e000:141b:7a:4537:6946:52f5:6753]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a138sm18581896pfd.47.2018.02.17.12.42.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:42:08 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Glenn Deen <rgd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15C153)
In-Reply-To: <5657276F-E288-42C7-ABA1-5F0A16557B49@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:42:07 -0800
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, iasa20@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <06602FE1-B3CA-477C-AD2F-ED6B6AB9F9A2@gmail.com>
References: <4483006c-1652-7340-19f8-8d0579af8213@cdt.org> <20182.1518727709@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <C77B41DA-268D-4F0E-8AC8-F2E292E38B14@cooperw.in> <9631.1518800971@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <be961111-9bed-086e-a0ab-b220125a438d@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <20180216185551.cgigor7up7uowmr6@mx4.yitter.info> <40a7ffe5-8417-cfdf-15dc-6603a5c7978f@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <20180216192334.jjgn6bineinfofux@mx4.yitter.info> <5327daa0-1d54-f051-e620-7c8f4bdc4870@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <20180216223021.jxetl5cz4uzem24c@mx4.yitter.info> <5657276F-E288-42C7-ABA1-5F0A16557B49@gmail.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/JIoRVzKtAaeGZxVCcGo5XcJSoXQ>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Memo exploring options for IASA 2.0 models
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called “IASA 2.0” project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:42:11 -0000

> On Feb 16, 2018, at 3:00 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:

> Seems to me that as long as ISOC provides most of the support for the IETF (and I think that true in each options presented), doesn’t this just morph into "ISOC is paying for the IETF, I gave money to the ISOC, why are you asking me again?".  Unless we are financially independent of ISOC, I don’t think moving to a new entity will really change this.
> 
> Bob

There are different degrees of independence as represented by the three models.  

While financial independence comes with the real responsibility to live within our budgets and foundational moneys like any mature organization has to, it does permit donors to directly know that what they give to the IETF really grows the IETF budget and not simply offset money ISOC would have otherwise contributed were it not for the donation.

It may actually help us raise funds more easily in some circles.

Glenn Deen