[Iasa20] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02

Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 30 July 2019 17:51 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, iasa20@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <156450909847.14172.1826069794172826811@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:51:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/KKKRELqI-lNaAbnHHMi0iSbu6vY>
Subject: [Iasa20] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02

Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2019-07-30
IETF LC End Date: 2019-08-14
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This is a well written document making an administrative update to RFC
7776 and it is ready for publication in this format.

However, given that RFC 7776 may be read by someone who is distressed having
been harassed, and who may not know about errata, I wonder if it would be
better to issue a clean copy of the main RFC with these (and no other) changes.
 If needed the RFC Editor could simply apply these edits to their master copy.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
  == Outdated reference: A later version (-09) exists of
     draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis-06

[Iasa20] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ia… Stewart Bryant via Datatracker