Re: [Iasa20] CoI proposal

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 06 May 2019 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC6A120155 for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2019 14:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yr57pAo35Twk for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2019 14:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB061200EA for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 May 2019 14:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121103826C; Mon, 6 May 2019 17:06:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 16EABCBC; Mon, 6 May 2019 17:06:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147E9A8A; Mon, 6 May 2019 17:06:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMCJib6uGRkMhfc+=eW0zzzCb64XJsqrLG9B8hWbmoFhZg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMCJib6uGRkMhfc+=eW0zzzCb64XJsqrLG9B8hWbmoFhZg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 17:06:35 -0400
Message-ID: <10956.1557176795@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/LV5h927NOKaYTZ83S2oF8y3HBFQ>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] CoI proposal
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called “IASA 2.0” project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 21:06:39 -0000

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
    > The Board members agree that any employment, contract, or affiliation (for
    > themselves of their household) that might touch on the work of the IETF or
    > the LLC must be disclosed to the Board as a whole.

    > The Board then certifies to the community that each member has provided the
    > appropriate disclosure and they are operating in awareness of these potential
    > conflict.

.. can the board please uniquely identify or number these CoIs.
I would like the LLC minutes (including any abstracted summaries of in-camera
activity), to then disclose by number if someone reclused themselves by
number.

The goal is here for the community to see if the non-public CoIs were in fact
causing the board member to become ineffective.



--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-