IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Iasa20] Odd deprecations in draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd-05

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 12 February 2019 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F249130DDA for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:23:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HhTIEIsiaeeM for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:23:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A1B5130DD3 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:23:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.39.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1CKNEBP078275 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:23:15 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1550002995; bh=f46mAinJRUtalT1+huRzKAWxPKkYz1pXagSb1CPj3Ps=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=ehIkURKucEKCA1mHt1GHjdblZ/w+EIiNLTMqdK2KeFAKTutynOd6ACMawfnX+awuq BOAhCCoHVnc8b0rUM5uLzU9IipTjC8khTisAnTYXFz4vyBM3e1Ts0/CoCB+TGVqPlA xPNlpgInwuKHIKiavEvYVySq3VyBtBb9ly8kDh7Q=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.39.7] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <1b58312a-ab8e-ccba-2f9b-884091e1c603@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:23:14 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/LpP1jKRkik23AEX2kO4_3-D89A8>
Subject: [Iasa20] Odd deprecations in draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd-05
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 20:23:17 -0000

I realize this is a bit late (since the document has been pubreq'ed), 
but I wanted to call this out before IETF Last Call. A re-review of some 
of the documents going through the IAB stream caused me to read this one 
more closely this week. Apologies for not being active on the list when 
this was discussed.

I was surprised that this document was obsoleting things like RFC3929 ( 
Alternative Decision Making Processes for Consensus-Blocked Decisions in 
the IETF ) and RFC 4633 ( Experiment in Long-Term Suspensions From 
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Mailing Lists ).

It seems outside the remit of this working group to deprecate/obsolete 
these (or perhaps any) RFCs (whether they should be or not).

I also note that the body had five RFCs that it asks to deprecate and 
move to historic, but only three of those listed as obsoleted.

RjS

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email