IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-09: (with COMMENT)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 11 April 2019 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D8F120366 for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kf0j5HDUeQ33 for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B73BE12030F for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65275300580 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:50:38 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 60Jvnqt52Eiw for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:50:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [138.88.156.37]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15532300400; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:50:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <61DE89DC-5DBD-410A-875E-561FBE15B96D@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1DEB5697-5014-447F-9D90-D0E1EBCE69E1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:08:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CABtrr-XO2hCcjJ03a-RJwpf6ruDHEU2+0GG_UGCS+4yP26F7VA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>, Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
To: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
References: <155498907076.25231.13801022071773065752.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABtrr-XbQkVvGykEMDnb9jyFxZaei39R=4KgbnBXsB5nsoermQ@mail.gmail.com> <D206DBE5-D324-430A-BE60-C2B28C7AFE61@cisco.com> <CABtrr-V4+VGEU9A+sEhCA3N9bTtw99XbkvB-XhtKi-pKWTmUwg@mail.gmail.com> <8E796892-04BF-418B-81D9-5F96CE35533A@cisco.com> <CABtrr-XO2hCcjJ03a-RJwpf6ruDHEU2+0GG_UGCS+4yP26F7VA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/RIPj_zK_0K1e6wljfjTf57Zia6s>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:09:00 -0000


> On Apr 11, 2019, at 2:02 PM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 14:00 Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com <mailto:lear@cisco.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 11 Apr 2019, at 13:54, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org <mailto:joe@cdt.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> I'd really rather not, but that's just author-clingy-ness and an aversion to big changes in text. One proposal would be just eliminate everything but the first paragraph of the Abstract (I think all of that is repeated at greater length in the intro).
> 
> Actually, I think you’re fine if you drop everything but the LAST paragraph.  That paragraph very succinctly states what the document is.  Also keep the last sentence about obsoleting RFC 4071.
> 
> Thank you. Would love to hear from others.

I think a blend of the first and last paragraphs is best.  There is overlap between them already:

Abstract

   The IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA) was originally
   established in 2005.  In the years since then, the needs of the IETF
   evolved in ways that required changes to its administrative
   structure.  The purpose of this document is to document and describe
   the IETF Administrative Support Activity, version 2 (IASA 2.0).  It
   defines the roles and responsibilities of the IETF Administrative
   LLC Board, the IETF Executive Director, and the Internet Society in
   the fiscal and administrative support of the IETF standards process.
   It also defines the membership and selection rules for the IETF
   Administrative LLC Board.

   This document obsoletes RFC 4071, RFC 4333, and RFC 7691.


Russ

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email