[Iasa20] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 05 September 2019 14:22 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietf.org
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41501200CD; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis@ietf.org, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@team.neustar>, iasa2-chairs@ietf.org, jon.peterson@team.neustar, iasa20@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <156769336889.22735.13247671238642869026.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 07:22:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/UwIIB-xHf9sewcmqFwo3PoRCX9o>
Subject: [Iasa20] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called IASA 2.0 project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 14:22:49 -0000
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the discussion about what we mean when we request to update the metadata ("Updates:) headers. It's also not entirely clear to me that we need to Update 7776 to remove the references to its updating of 7437, since RFC-7776-the-immutable-artifact does/did indeed update 7437; it's just that 7437 itself is no longer current/relevant.
- [Iasa20] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-i… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker