IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-09: (with COMMENT)

Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> Thu, 11 April 2019 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jhall@cdt.org>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0BD12030F for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cdt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H51Ih49dgTnZ for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B81120144 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 3so5772834oir.7 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cdt.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/xfL3rM/2X2v6/YOojddcQ4d12K4MI2BrriBBOTopNc=; b=VA4L9XtGnkOuRStYjujFMbF3Md3JM+AlHKu8OUDFTnSf8KBR3LlSYpnd0YXn8vsN8/ oFzY6setjOSeXSw39PfBJ8K+pU4nwqYwrlHQvJ0XCHqsivtFENuDdNMmk1pocfWLMr3J mtGNcvh1365GyYsbZ4jnxP3P8g2z6S99eY9ao=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/xfL3rM/2X2v6/YOojddcQ4d12K4MI2BrriBBOTopNc=; b=NDJQSEq2ozAIBOaFVzL9lZYTkefj3uQYJOkIctfxPg4VjPAjfigsDXpwUrLjPO+l+O A1fGA6YPBkP56IyflD/pQeNUBsZWjb4uemGdO/wzTJ5UhQBzqMNg44F02nPWMQWoFcT+ Cp1sFKHFSeDqSRxOWvjRmlMcS3Samj2XeON6ShZMUCy3DOmUvPlYZOvWbahHJN0uyTC4 vXxjrgcxI7yU00aJUkNGuCEM0sQvM6yQ+cbpZMwOrD0NJHOElke5wZEwGEY8AnYVqI0N 1b2JrWIUJj7EzQxipLsVw01XAX7q0T6iCCTil+rOeulPMyHY8cbmcWbvha+mKyD149kz jswg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX78YZOzUbo5HOCYk5VGfzLzuyWngzvT1nF4B3eLSYa5hqhRrrO 5dZIz7inucjmocbKqoZrhcPOdyHEyq6Iu4/pAnypJw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwtXUri6Wyz/RRHhhrqmZUzbCEpKlImQbbCff9+VOpeZXMv1Cvi7Oe+MVAjfw3nfkjpIZXfRLpiSdYnlyxXACk=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:4507:: with SMTP id s7mr7180980oia.127.1555007205568; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155498907076.25231.13801022071773065752.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABtrr-XbQkVvGykEMDnb9jyFxZaei39R=4KgbnBXsB5nsoermQ@mail.gmail.com> <D206DBE5-D324-430A-BE60-C2B28C7AFE61@cisco.com> <CABtrr-V4+VGEU9A+sEhCA3N9bTtw99XbkvB-XhtKi-pKWTmUwg@mail.gmail.com> <8E796892-04BF-418B-81D9-5F96CE35533A@cisco.com> <CABtrr-XO2hCcjJ03a-RJwpf6ruDHEU2+0GG_UGCS+4yP26F7VA@mail.gmail.com> <61DE89DC-5DBD-410A-875E-561FBE15B96D@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <61DE89DC-5DBD-410A-875E-561FBE15B96D@vigilsec.com>
From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:26:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CABtrr-X7dDxb2Hj7Mt5o6vxfbbFHHpRRtirCqVQhEsDoMY680g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>, Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001c88850586455405"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/VEhlVUeFnxvGAlzfid2qSruPgwA>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:26:48 -0000

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 2:08 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Apr 11, 2019, at 2:02 PM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 14:00 Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 11 Apr 2019, at 13:54, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> wrote:
>>
>> I'd really rather not, but that's just author-clingy-ness and an aversion
>> to big changes in text. One proposal would be just eliminate everything but
>> the first paragraph of the Abstract (I think all of that is repeated at
>> greater length in the intro).
>>
>>
>> Actually, I think you’re fine if you drop everything but the LAST
>> paragraph.  That paragraph very succinctly states what the document is.
>> Also keep the last sentence about obsoleting RFC 4071.
>>
>
> Thank you. Would love to hear from others.
>
>
> I think a blend of the first and last paragraphs is best.  There is
> overlap between them already:
>
> Abstract
>
>    The IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA) was originally
>    established in 2005.  In the years since then, the needs of the IETF
>    evolved in ways that required changes to its administrative
>    structure.  The purpose of this document is to document and describe
>    the IETF Administrative Support Activity, version 2 (IASA 2.0).  It
>    defines the roles and responsibilities of the IETF Administrative
>    LLC Board, the IETF Executive Director, and the Internet Society in
>    the fiscal and administrative support of the IETF standards process.
>    It also defines the membership and selection rules for the IETF
>    Administrative LLC Board.
>
>    This document obsoletes RFC 4071, RFC 4333, and RFC 7691.
>
>
> Russ
>
>
Works for me. Will make this change in the working document shortly. Thanks
to everyone for being so responsive. best, Joe

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email