IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 08 April 2019 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E7E120104; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NLzaUqKQFu99; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31717120013; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id f6so7978498pgs.8; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 13:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eq/aU404T8jK0UWEG8m/gm4lx+E+DYcSnC76Y1ybtRs=; b=POqkuTmMcTk9BuxtTlF9a0l06gkPp8bpVQaRb2jmRWELlodgb7kSA7AQla/LeAXh+d ShmfIS3w2iw8KeBCbOIUMdWx/kn4ETcksoZEfNhdiZv/j+W3Lq3L1ANBDmSkYYRH651g WDaA/Er0LTIvD9r6Q6J0pNgwAEQLFnabKUjAVHIJVMfcQxksgSAHuSaCxfb9FzowUb8v Z/i+Zi2MjBcR0eIfxPDr80FnIMoAaxwhtKe0Vnk2aXCbci0MvYds9LKtu8NKyfHsJoWz 9VZtUTsluBrCYqhlLHIy2eDWnBein2vqVRefWYbMIUE2BzUMiuFKK6Llpq7FCZsAHwTv F8Fw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eq/aU404T8jK0UWEG8m/gm4lx+E+DYcSnC76Y1ybtRs=; b=Hp3qLiLTuiBZi0uI5sx1jgyGxud1QOVZPf2aGSyKM5JWmuKffMchEDOvmtPUEDZkUt GvtcIU19ab3jDqSnia4de81ZNGk3n6trd1ELCkEnC4mDVcVfwLEQwV4sBR0xkF3mzSw6 LvdkfcLSrb8bqmAQ+pPlByO3uwA/A01iaB88y/49lJtihqTJuGXhRLARvefjVmeDhPWH j9fwq2ejl46oSgS7XsX4oDt2xHvA3b6jGUFb+gY3/izGQsfveeQ+ut7dtC5PGcGzX8+h Tqo6g9vkCDZVMJ+tQNVfh9dPR2VulAGea5vHbnkFdK1DZwoCAQJuC7TLGddzDWf5r33n zy4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU+I+mQmHNwUsaszdbNuVpr4Rv7KTGGc6bda3jNZR1PXuJhLCIV bTHy13HLs2HuKXkTPrSZj5w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzdXxOFjznktQfbK2XOYkW6cWOF7Zs9XOLdaYWkEJRO6x7O0oB3C21BpGK9dIzoRqrKIT2XFg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:cc0b:: with SMTP id x11mr13304693pgf.35.1554757069499; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 13:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([118.148.72.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y23sm44258898pfn.25.2019.04.08.13.57.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Apr 2019 13:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis@ietf.org, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>, iasa2-chairs@ietf.org, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <155470226964.18209.2289908384768506570.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMB40Op1igA4emnkB=XWdj7ZzuUrK_5nTWBnW928FVW9pg@mail.gmail.com> <0B892B67-6402-4898-A041-C232CA4A2E35@vigilsec.com> <CA+9kkMBNVEFZQWO8c8g2AARZ7xidZLYGF1BhJnXvULkzrPBkSA@mail.gmail.com> <803F101C-F519-446D-A660-73B9EDE4CB56@vigilsec.com> <CA+9kkMB0Q=n_GSbtZF43iU310tZG3T=y0sXAowD6jYQdRdBd=g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <85d31d43-d98d-ad8a-01f5-a9ada3cf0110@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 08:57:43 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMB0Q=n_GSbtZF43iU310tZG3T=y0sXAowD6jYQdRdBd=g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/W8KNZcnKlnRUz6UaUV0npoZtvOQ>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 20:57:52 -0000

On 09-Apr-19 06:15, Ted Hardie wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:01 AM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     Yes, I agree that the length of the term was discussed.  I do no recall this aspect being discussed.
> 
>     At least one board seat will change every year.  If the two-year term stands, then only half of the IESG can be considered for the seat, and that would be the people that have the same IESG term as the IETF Chair.  The other half cannot be sure that they will still be on the IESG for a full two years.
> 
> 
> As Joe noted, they do not have to be members of the IESG at all.  If they were appointed while on the IESG and then rotated off by NomCom action, they could still serve the remaining year.  Presumably, the IESG would have to take that into account when deciding who to select, but it is pretty clearly permitted by the document now.

Agreed. And as somebody else pointed out, the incumbent can always resign
if they happen to leave the IESG mid-term; or not, if they are happy to
continue for another year, including of course communicating with the
IESG as needed. If they were a worthy Board member in the first place,
where's the problem?

Did the WG analyze every possible ramification? No. But as far as I'm
concerned this was a conscious choice that obtained WG consensus.

    Brian

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email