Re: [Iasa20] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with DISCUSS)

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Thu, 05 September 2019 07:07 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70ECD1200A1; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 00:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.334
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.334 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mQYY4wh_-2YP; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 00:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr70080.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.7.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BD7712006E; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 00:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=UIg1KlWvLWAgTl8kg5g+CnO2zqEwUwzgsJPfl1YLvubLi8hHd7HONA6uRds2k8qvOYjp8JLCNkSgGAIpdJu1X1fs/wJlV0YDsmpk0s8MEVDE1g3+fy8F1QM54zZSSgC8/owd6xJsC5p16jq2/iuHblZcJZBj5B+F/yFs/Eq0d2/h4B/iESg8zrbYg0Y+NJ7VPDodtp5bkFhq3hYcOtXbjP+ix0qj7g6jaE6Dxr4PJfHdp7ZoP9xkuIIlG8uPrJTsfB2MOqLn7fcMKbyAq71P6mDx/ZECs2bsqAgIYsaFZsYJSl4Uszt8DlDv47rwehFNFGxXtQhQ9ODCkMQsuIT+9w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=0YS5nEiH8d5RTsKGiFSR/V01KjU8ysyVbwFbaCoB90A=; b=WfV6CXYAMEqj+ZkLE9kz3zfq//pCKj2T7jOv2zcSB/gfLQ+pmunbhS7RCJXhAy+NND+OMOQnTKZXh5PiKIZ6n3gqzyHeu6fKKbQQhCAJtiTKxOrc6LiPJ4Vjii30/JqmlBhyYgP7Q9RxaA1uDsFge3tg7JpfAIGojoIqSDd16cndK9EEDLBuHwx9QM+CAUInkXSqsX+ftLpD18Mlvjr89vqDjS+iDBqsAZIKn9bFHHSZ8v1wjSj/ATGJZpLjtQeNFkNrHgaKEvtg9vlJCxGZMtfTBrwBS/EquUbFCoy2Oq3SoyIOYGoPJUcp/9jG2k7xK+GGz6531kzQexo77txdGA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=0YS5nEiH8d5RTsKGiFSR/V01KjU8ysyVbwFbaCoB90A=; b=Krs5voJklfM7/34W1f+TB22flz5OvuxNmol8YY5RHcQfBEx8uKas2VDn7FJfCfM1YGzH9Tf8oJn88So4es7Z31oBSWpB7IHW8iDI5h/WXlEW+Ugq5e6KU2E1ueoRpBGoyN651BhfgsplPeL2EAHxBNACqwALIRo0zEk2bLsSm7I=
Received: from DB7PR07MB5736.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.177.194.155) by DB7PR07MB4827.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.42.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2263.5; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:06:54 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB5736.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a935:4edd:29a2:9772]) by DB7PR07MB5736.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a935:4edd:29a2:9772%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2241.014; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:06:54 +0000
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
To: "resnick@episteme.net" <resnick@episteme.net>, "barryleiba@computer.org" <barryleiba@computer.org>
CC: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "jon.peterson@team.neustar" <jon.peterson@team.neustar>, "iasa20@ietf.org" <iasa20@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis@ietf.org>, "iasa2-chairs@ietf.org" <iasa2-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHVYyoltcCjrn0rv0SIkN4oCVkayacbkPaAgAAzlICAAAQmAIAAA2+AgADeioA=
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:06:54 +0000
Message-ID: <f6d19040302f5b030c922995ba32ccc3f652de44.camel@ericsson.com>
References: <156760606264.22791.12804140363041746046.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <027b01d5632b$a6dc59e0$f4950da0$@olddog.co.uk> <3EE9F221-21A9-46CC-88FF-7879EB6FB619@episteme.net> <CALaySJLNmxpS9+m-Zg15Z67s=7sRLNsL=muJcVry2Aymv6RZyQ@mail.gmail.com> <E0529E4A-8591-4DC2-8BCA-AB447D339F46@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <E0529E4A-8591-4DC2-8BCA-AB447D339F46@episteme.net>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [192.176.1.82]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2b568156-8a17-4f4b-e141-08d731cfa23c
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(49563074)(7193020); SRVR:DB7PR07MB4827;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR07MB4827:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB7PR07MB48275BEFB4A4476E0B40055895BB0@DB7PR07MB4827.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 015114592F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(366004)(346002)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(13464003)(189003)(199004)(6116002)(3846002)(5660300002)(2906002)(6306002)(6512007)(6436002)(478600001)(6246003)(53936002)(99286004)(316002)(54906003)(110136005)(53546011)(6506007)(76176011)(186003)(102836004)(26005)(86362001)(71200400001)(25786009)(44832011)(2501003)(486006)(91956017)(76116006)(118296001)(476003)(2616005)(11346002)(446003)(66446008)(66946007)(66616009)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(36756003)(71190400001)(4326008)(14454004)(966005)(99936001)(14444005)(256004)(81156014)(81166006)(305945005)(66066001)(8936002)(8676002)(229853002)(7736002)(6486002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DB7PR07MB4827; H:DB7PR07MB5736.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: erUfCDC0vbyIBhDt+5OYY06EdRKgbKI0jo6RQr0l+rqtktRhpiePYLv6JqgNiP6h6e1lu4CtNiyDwQvv8klN5juR9xBserZc0NgfHpITwfR5uFm+qhcITUFHOnVpzIvGkxfAGWn6zb54EAA7JGcXySrf2xXbE7fnqgfdhfenZm2jEFMqpamt2qAYYAracNZwNOAU2S4TJOFClTnVsLVQXCeHs5NFjeKWEMQUoFoO07ncRaZzTRTohQXExRRVFn+QihJPbaI5x9/YOaAM2ztpQv0DB+la4tUmshcqX5jAeQy/YRgmHFk51YHWgpGD9P20XUfjeEZkPJG4mqmA9diyOaNt6zwwWgMQ4o4/p3yGGqkN0kDE8YAOdH20n7LMJBsm/IYFBKNntZ8Y/iS4s7OUSDslMiO5hC7yM9ltMZY5pU0=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha-256"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-D3uqDbtoSUpa9DzSwIrL"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2b568156-8a17-4f4b-e141-08d731cfa23c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Sep 2019 07:06:54.4485 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: rekUqDq1RllTh59zKhNmsTD4zGIIm/a1YA0d8fyfWIhN5FhesYRF0n2CPRiF9MDfJZGlLLHp6VDwgPbKpNEA9IbAF8iH+n1emtbpT/3YitM=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB4827
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/WUSqXSwwqnwOZZH4f-Xr5QaACnM>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 07:07:01 -0000

Hi,

I will clear but, I think the IESG very much needs a to have a
discussion on this topic. And I wouldn't be surprised if that needs to
then continue with the community. And I think the charter or WG
decision to make a old new style changes document here was very much
the wrong approach. Not having engaged I have a hard time to believe
that the constraints to only do necessary for a specific topic of
changes should be sufficient for the WG, and the IESG. 

If the IESG has problems keeping its fingers from discussing /
commenting that implies changes outside of the scope of the charter for
changes then we have a real problem with being dammed either way. 

Cheers

Magnus



On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 12:50 -0500, Pete Resnick wrote:
> On 4 Sep 2019, at 12:38, Barry Leiba wrote:
> 
> > Pete, I have no issue with your conclusion, and I don't think we
> > should block this document... but there's one thing you say:
> > 
> > > your comment is a strictly on
> > > the editorial choice and readability of the document, which is
> > > quite
> > > explicitly a non-criteria for a DISCUSS.
> > 
> > Where in the DISCUSS non-criteria
> > <https://www.ietf.org/blog/discuss-criteria-iesg-review/> does it
> > say
> > that *readability* of the document is out of bounds? I certainly
> > hope
> > that's not true.
> 
> • Stylistic issues of any kind. The IESG are welcome to copy-edit as 
> a non-blocking comment, but this should not obstruct document 
> processing.
> 
> Now, if Magnus really means that the document is literally
> unreadable, 
> that a reader truly couldn't figure out what was meant, I absolutely 
> agree that would be DISCUSSable. But I took him as being a little
> more 
> metaphorical by saying, "soup that is not readable".
> 
> > On the other hand, the first DISCUSS criterion
> > refers to "clarity issues"
> 
> Clarity issues which make it "impossible to implement", not just any 
> clarity issues. "Impossible" seems a pretty strong word.
> 
> > and the second that "the description is
> > unclear in such a way that the reader cannot understand it without
> > ambiguity."
> 
> Again, this comes down to "cannot understand". If that's really what 
> Magnus means, then DISCUSS away.
> 
> (I will note that another non-criteria is:
> 
> • Reiteration of the issues that have been raised and discussed as 
> part of WG or IETF Last Call, unless the AD believes they have not
> been 
> properly addressed.
> 
> Again, the caveat at the end might be reasonable, but Magnus didn't
> make 
> that clear.)
> 
> > As I noted in my (non-DISCUSS) ballot, I think the attempt to
> > change
> > the metadata in this way is hard to follow, and is therefore a poor
> > choice, and I suspect that's where Magnus is as well.
> 
> I don't disagree with you or he on the point. I had the XML for 7776 
> dusted off and ready to go when we were told to go in this other 
> direction. As Adrian said, we are willing to take a change in
> direction 
> if that is the IESG decision.
> 
> > I don't care about this further for this document, as I hope Magnus
> > will clear his DISCUSS after this discussion and we'll go forward.
> > But I would hate to leave us with the idea that we can't DISCUSS a
> > document because of serious readability issues.
> 
> For large values of "serious", no doubt. I take that to mean,
> "anything 
> that cannot be safely fixed by the RFC Editor and leaves the
> document 
> non-understandable".
> 
> pr
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 1:23 PM Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>; 
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > Magnus,
> > > 
> > > Yes, in fact the idea of doing a new obsoletes-7776 version was
> > > the
> > > first suggestion, which was subsequently waived off by the WG and
> > > the
> > > responsible AD. But as Adrian points out, your comment is a
> > > strictly 
> > > on
> > > the editorial choice and readability of the document, which is
> > > quite
> > > explicitly a non-criteria for a DISCUSS. That said, a similar
> > > comment 
> > > to
> > > yours was made in the GenART review during Last Call on the main
> > > IETF
> > > list, and there have been several ADs who have also so commented,
> > > so
> > > perhaps you are claiming that there was no consensus and
> > > therefore 
> > > this
> > > should be DISCUSSed. Your ballot does not make clear who needs to
> > > address this problem: Is it the authors (in which case we need
> > > more
> > > guidance) or is it the responsible AD (in which case we will wait
> > > for
> > > the outcome)?
> > > 
> > > pr
> > > 
> > > On 4 Sep 2019, at 9:18, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi Magnus,
> > > > 
> > > > Not sure how the authors can address your Discuss.
> > > > 
> > > > We were tasked by the WG to produce this document in this form
> > > > and
> > > > specifically to not open the existing document even for
> > > > restrained
> > > > edits. I think this arose because the WG interpreted its
> > > > charter 
> > > > very
> > > > strictly and did not want to risk any other change sneaking in.
> > > > 
> > > > It would, of course, be basically simply editorial to revise
> > > > 7776 
> > > > and,
> > > > since that was an AD sponsored piece of work, we could do that 
> > > > instead
> > > > or as well.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm sure the editors remain at the service of the community,
> > > > but it
> > > > would be nice to not have to do the work twice.
> > > > 
> > > > Best,
> > > > Adrian
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>;
> > > > Sent: 04 September 2019 15:08
> > > > To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;
> > > > Cc: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis@ietf.org; Jon Peterson
> > > > <jon.peterson@team.neustar>;; iasa2-chairs@ietf.org;
> > > > jon.peterson@team.neustar; iasa20@ietf.org
> > > > Subject: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on
> > > > draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with DISCUSS)
> > > > 
> > > > Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
> > > > draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: Discuss
> > > > 
> > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply
> > > > to 
> > > > all
> > > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
> > > > cut
> > > > this
> > > > introductory paragraph, however.)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Please refer to
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found
> > > > here:
> > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis/
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > ---------
> > > > DISCUSS:
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > ---------
> > > > 
> > > > I don't understand why not a replacement for RFC7776 was
> > > > produced
> > > > instead of
> > > > this soup that is not readable. Publishing this in this form is
> > > > providing very
> > > > mixed messages to the community where we (IESG) apparently are 
> > > > aiming
> > > > for
> > > > readability and ease of comparing older and newer documents,
> > > > but 
> > > > can't
> > > > be
> > > > bothered to ensure that is produced when it comes to the
> > > > process
> > > > documents.
> > > > Also RFC 7776 appears to be very self contained and with
> > > > removal of
> > > > content
> > > > that will be even more true.
> 
> 
-- 
Cheers

Magnus Westerlund 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Architecture & Protocols, Ericsson Research
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Torshamnsgatan 23           | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------