[Iasa20] Ballot positions on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis

[Alissa Cooper <[e-mail]>]

Dear IESG,

I wanted to draw your special attention to this text in draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis:

"This revision addresses only the changes required for IASA 2.0;
   should the community agree on other changes, they will be addressed
   in future documents.”

As well as this text in the IASA2 WG charter:

"This working group is chartered to document the normative changes to IETF administrative structures and processes necessary to effectuate [the change to IASA 2.0].”

If the IESG is not going to allow draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis or other IASA2 documents to progress unless changes unrelated to IASA 2.0 are made, I think the WG needs to be rechartered. The authors and the WG purposefully did not make any other changes to the base documents, so making other changes as a result of IESG evaluation does not seem appropriate. I think the appropriate thing to do would be for ADs who want to see that happen to start a thread about re-chartering on the iasa20 list. (Note: this is not my preference since I suspect it will delay the minimal changes related to IASA 2.0 from being published for a long time, but if that’s what the community wants I’ll support it.)

Thanks,
Alissa