Re: [Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 10 April 2019 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4DD12041D; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sABCC-GBGhwd; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-f172.google.com (mail-it1-f172.google.com [209.85.166.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39E9B12044E; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-f172.google.com with SMTP id y134so5023505itc.5; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tLeEBgjczdc2Qv30xqLGOcbd7OCXI6HmUlrnekwZ4Jc=; b=N/Q8c4cwgPyFO1hO1E0A1YKDFwnaNWZIfLr5v1dh1tn8oyVhcwRoS/s4dkGWQAmdyn n3kPfgvBhB5q47Hv/jfqM4sM3lATXMtyir1gRXHS+9d/MNJAC8OQkL9vNTNfu3xCJV9z ktCTBFsVG/dZa6Yv1VQFlnSMy/AK3ltL0ENBzxdtzL5oK8Vq1hX4CZUxFwPhbsanf3pn D+CNz+UEsGcXAfGN9tudgK792y0UIPiqOeyAnhfy+2jzJE0NMyoIhVvz1cBfpHX9zMuL WX4TZxRb7BGTUz4C7PNGZUKk06n6pcDQt6IoqGh7XdYhu5sVbkp/g6Ohdc5RryoApoow BGfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWYgFFnkzhwlK3RzAPEpPdakvFGHKRY3ZUCkDQiCcnKC0kBbjIq 2zfiUdD9t9MoUH+fbi4fO2ZWO8kLIriv8KGNmEI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyaTYXPDK46PIc7EFsy5gZB+8/RHyc/S1RTrui0t6cnePz7Jm3ks8K91k71BLdw/auuK9pLLW7CMIJYo/mAUfo=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:edc2:: with SMTP id r185mr1898637ith.66.1554920064348; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155470226964.18209.2289908384768506570.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABtrr-W35cxjayxqhj2=duUVSU+XmHQpemOK=2Wv2ZFjj0f2pA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJLwiTvf32RwBqLXYg3xfrm9pAOi9rPuUcWkiP8MRoTupQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLwiTvf32RwBqLXYg3xfrm9pAOi9rPuUcWkiP8MRoTupQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:14:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJLFJkDKFpGuhv4mgV=XFmQovodjVa5Ndaee9vPmaYh0NQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis@ietf.org, iasa2-chairs@ietf.org, IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/aeLgd5El_dnUektZIALV39C1_P4>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:14:27 -0000

Joe, the -09 version sorts out my DISCUSS issue, so I'll clear that.
I'm going to leave the non-DISCUSS comments in for the record, but the
only one that I think still could use action is this one:

> >> — Section 6.10 —
> >> What does “from time to time” mean here?  I can’t figure out how to fit the
> >> normal English meaning of the idiom in here
> >
> > Hmmm, I don't find this confusing but a term like "as needed" may be more clear?
> > I don't think we intend to limit the ability of the board to adjourn official business
> > until they can get a quorum of folks in the room.
>
> Ah, I see what you're getting at, then.  So I would just remove the
> phrase altogether; what remains says exactly what you mean:
>
> NEW
>    If a quorum is not present at any
>    meeting of the Board, the Directors present may adjourn the meeting
>    without notice, other than announcement at the
>    meeting, until a quorum is present.
> END

Thanks for the work on this, Joe -- and all the others who
participated in the discussion.

Barry