Re: [Iasa20] Some observations

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 22 March 2017 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614CF12948D for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gVGRvbc_PbDa for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22f.google.com (mail-io0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB62E126C0F for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id f84so72215366ioj.0 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SyEgAKUd6zP/Yuhi7y3nS4gRN7vduLEK/7l8SZ1y5/c=; b=rrY7AFqHt7LZ2NO6I00sz27+x+tcJ9ttBWQMaxMTmJhSQ9v4nisouzO1+kGqyqjVeo Qmo+3pU4w6A1lnBUHkRfHPoCWK9eGCBDbntWaCLus1QI4i9Q6uJV6zhyhUuPvfWyuh6s Wr1bnatFoSIls3e2GorVzl7kqljvZle4FL2xEwkVQADTEmRYXgEpeYRRvGHU4HGxPf9u uv0UKo/9zCoKOA4QXWShVuUiBIOSja3jvplMe6BUxNelIxb7UmCCeWQM+Kj+2OPuXN/P 9I5jcyUOej2zlmOPBW0kFtRnnTTUTmNlR/Yddq5qlhI/l+pivBrj2jWw9ObTkQZdMyQP YbQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SyEgAKUd6zP/Yuhi7y3nS4gRN7vduLEK/7l8SZ1y5/c=; b=FE9oFhPhFtVZVvCA2WzhOaMwhpZH7Q6hbZjSM6GTFvurbsr7j6hPNHFsG1uaqAHupZ OxqgzppsG9Glkf7eSLHi6MaF2SpQmkdCH4cVeNJk59bPAxD3z996LpeJmjqi07ch/V7b gKk2ZXx651iZo+TT9ZU1LvOWqwC3zQJYvfhPQj2/DJ6zbq63prB+At5bu04VaiviaA7i xTEisRJrD813EaTNEiL39dpwVPTjozObWarUmaGQyLZ1MnNNzla5UpVeQ/yrpvXwoavq lmy6+WUwgXj1SQALEoXN0HVZzg4FjlsfjxFU0ZmYJ/6+D3GoK+R5ZrwP+pEmSSeYLWMl PL3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0dL9yGM+tny+rwMYQ4nRnugQlXw0DNoF6LApEOc1dWIaOu+kehFUnPEIZs6azhJA==
X-Received: by 10.107.20.145 with SMTP id 139mr40831321iou.55.1490219240904; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.11.95] (50-76-68-137-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.76.68.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r133sm723341ith.9.2017.03.22.14.47.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <A86A4667-0403-4796-B2F6-8F584D7344D5@cooperw.in> <96b3036d-3ce1-2d25-a514-addee4f44fe3@dcrocker.net>
Cc: iasa20@ietf.org
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <13a3c98a-6aa4-9176-6c9e-baa43617a194@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:47:26 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <96b3036d-3ce1-2d25-a514-addee4f44fe3@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/cHQdmk2955m79aSC1T1RdFYDf40>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Some observations
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called “IASA 2.0” project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:47:23 -0000

On 23/03/2017 05:03, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 3/22/2017 6:31 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>> We've also talked about the IAD being overloaded
> 
> 
> This is a persistent reference but I don't recall seeing its foundation, 
> particularly given the reference for calling on up to 20 other ISOC 
> staffers.

Isn't the point that only one FTE is *allocated*, in the person of
the IAD, and since that clearly isn't enough and the rest of the
staff work is "borrowed", there is a conflict between theory (1 FTE)
and reality? In that situation, the IAD is pretty much guaranteed to
be overloaded.

   Brian