Re: [Iasa20] 6635bis

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 28 April 2019 03:44 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FA1120098 for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=4Dge5C71; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=lYZ4MNBH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09853gd4ta2w for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A5FA120048 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 99358 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2019 03:44:07 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1841c.5cc52187.k1904; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=pGfyfiXn1XiICjJ8N+rcUuGfHmxb1cHHj5b6eY8X5E8=; b=4Dge5C71uCiTJ3j1285ZCA0ZNm+bg0dZs49eYk6/Dc4uGDoWxzO7ETVZUK6+Oft1BORQrhGVJr/XzWymsKkHuTQyaFEJrCsbrq7Gzqb0F1v2ddbISgyO64IKl/yLW/4EiZqGlbH2mntqAj83s+uh0ygvpunyV1mFD599M01EAjzYIeindJl7Humg1COihcVOZymzUcG2JIbf7reDoyipH7Ay6bTJS94wEmCY4aoVIh5Nn2OG1AvFWgdQ81JRg6Xg
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1841c.5cc52187.k1904; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=pGfyfiXn1XiICjJ8N+rcUuGfHmxb1cHHj5b6eY8X5E8=; b=lYZ4MNBH2Y5kcBsNFIknBmmbNj1rMkNg+58owv4J81/zUkiPqT+LQPpGVJTVjZbfXumCm93RFcEtY6I9YyVhT8iAq0sShnsVZdHsHNM0eKqfwA+1m44dPQP4KLa4DojaKNeX6vnrM6GLBHogUY162kEUfCo6nOgnYR7hDTYg6FdNsEtRRtKOpuxPyGpictrp7S8TLdONvGnfZgjgKSQIBlSXJmKQPB6vMCzeKxb4hxMfI4HJzmqg/epeRnKOeBB3
Received: from ary.qy ([68.175.130.230]) by imap.iecc.com ([64.57.183.75]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP; 28 Apr 2019 03:44:07 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4EC3B20130AC13; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 23:44:06 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 23:44:06 -0400
Message-Id: <20190428034407.4EC3B20130AC13@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: iasa20@ietf.org
Cc: bob.hinden@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <08102CCA-47F3-475A-A2A5-0E62B5BF3038@gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/cp0hjilizWCqC2FT8F3nUyvX8l8>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] 6635bis
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called “IASA 2.0” project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 03:44:12 -0000

In article <08102CCA-47F3-475A-A2A5-0E62B5BF3038@gmail.com> you write:
>I think that if the LLC is seriously thinking of moving the Production Center activity inside of the IETF LLC,
>they don’t understand this activity.   As others have said, it would grow the amount of staff needed by the
>LLC significantly and turn it into a medium size company with all that entails.

I'm fairly sure they aren't.  

The point is that in the past the IAOC's semi-non-existence forced us
to use contractors for everything.  We don't have that issue any more
and it's not hard to forsee a situation where it could make sense for
the LLC's director or the RSE to be an employee rather than a
contractor.  Or it might make sense to have an employee who does some
aspect of the meeting management.

As it stands the LLC can always fudge it by turning an employee into a
nominal contractor by running him or her through a body shop but that
seems silly.  The arguments against having employees all seem to be of
the form that organzation X or situation Y had or has employees who
are poorly managed, but that seems to me to mistake the symptom for
the problem.

R's,
John