Re: [Iasa20] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis-05: (with COMMENT)

["Livingood, Jason" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks and these changes will be made in the -06 shortly.

In response to your question on funding support, ISOC has only agreed to provide funding of a specific dollar figure through FY2020, after which a joint re-assessment will be conducted on future. I'll try to generalize the text. I don't think anyone expects that funding to go away in the foreseeable future of course.

Jason

On 8/20/19, 3:06 PM, "Roman Danyliw via Datatracker" <[e-mail]> wrote:

    Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis-05: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ** Section 1.  Typo.  s/the the/the/
    
    ** Section 3 makes the absolute statement that “the IETF and ISOC acknowledge
    that ISOC has no influence whatsoever on the technical content of the Internet
    standards”.  Section 4 reminds us that “ISOC maintain[ing] liaison
    relationships … with other … SDOs”.  Stretching a bit, given the reliance of
    the IETF on these key SDO relationships, the ability to or timeliness in
    forming/keeping these relationships could conceivably indirectly influence
    technical standards.  IMO, s/ISOC has no influence/ISOC has no direct
    influence/.
    
    Derived from Hilarie Orman’s SECDIR review:
    
    ** Section 7.  Per “Under the terms of the Operating Agreement [OpAgreement]
    between ISOC and the IETF, ISOC has agreed to provide some funding support for
    the IETF (ISOC has historically provided the IETF with significant financial
    support)”, what is the difference between “some funding” and “significant
    funding support”?
    
    ** References.  Explicitly point to
    https://www.ietf.org/documents/180/IETF-LLC-Agreement.pdf for [OpAgreement]