IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] Comments on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4844-bis-01

Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> Sat, 09 February 2019 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <jhall@cdt.org>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D28130F1B for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:18:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cdt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S3UiaIP6Me20 for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:18:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED61D130EE9 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:18:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id z19so5001227otm.2 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 17:18:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cdt.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/O4uMsVk392BXc96K2NhSlPn5p7k5LwgARRlBEnSvC4=; b=a8RKkQzEZhBPque/ulYkbWB1OoEE0pA0EkZZEqtpqkpbvPzfCldMkgE4ZgrCkwVuJs BOjBKQc0W4LME2VR2sxJgAAIeF9eImKiyzkIBymvdfune21Ua+9ISj7Qru2eIVx8wZeF 0u2d/ivSsN3sUUTzvvDprBtHBJz2L5xhSXAAg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/O4uMsVk392BXc96K2NhSlPn5p7k5LwgARRlBEnSvC4=; b=q2hWcwbcUpGYpRcEqofnXRLHbKlkOLBqwtekt4m9pWqjLZZdNgy6AzZYFUUKFalMPy pllnIIlKDlgKzDK/ulJIs/AThBHQBSHzPFKs6NOnC/xpaK7UU0zVcoX/+Ewckh2c3geO lWHS44o1Txfgodcvlo6Z0VAw/4oXSLkV5T/PLZ9vmB2d5kADeJEYqi3XLchbSlOevbBV wnrEpcV0/zV2JA5FOZE0CzEMotzx/6JkGJQY/JkyzlJl0IvZ1Pl7vgtgGjr+Vp/5pNlN wnU/kD6f8AltJhMe+S4l4dYYm4tBCF132xkOcKS4wqLTx1M52DTa+o/OGc6oUww9ww2P AkdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZ6H8G4E02PTNrSxBz0FWzl2/uog/wNjnh2vr7PtomVQXwCu3Yt 9EUASBwZ5+woP1vgFjXN8ebwuKCV0LijpTpDTHaZ2mmH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYwkDJs0mLwlZ6uJBBBmvOMkB1lOQ+E02pZ4UX8g5/qDIrXsGH1b0KMUqRCCupFP08Hsl90HH33C3Gn6LfJ9zc=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6d19:: with SMTP id o25mr8364299otp.97.1549675131654; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 17:18:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <32C06675-C60B-4D6A-979A-FC3653E56D42@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <32C06675-C60B-4D6A-979A-FC3653E56D42@cooperw.in>
From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 20:18:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CABtrr-XbqF1bqXZxrFG8kavM2xEhPa=-K0jDF1H90cSMr9nkFA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4844-bis@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bd698705816bdbe0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/h0FxIQwDaXFk2_71h7cnp8UYT7Y>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Comments on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4844-bis-01
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 01:18:55 -0000

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 20:11 Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:

>
> I haven’t started my AD review of 4071bis yet (hope to next week), but I
> think 4071bis has a problem in that the definition of “IASA” in that
> document is broken (it refers to the definition in 4071, which it itself is
> obsoleting). And until it is clear how we are defining “IASA,” I …
>

Ah, yeah there are a number of references in 4071bis that point to 4071;
we'll need to fix that. Best, Joe

> --
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Chief Technologist, Center for Democracy & Technology [https://www.cdt.org]
1401 K ST NW STE 200, Washington DC 20005-3497
e: joe@cdt.org, p: 202.407.8825, pgp: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key
Fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10  1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email