[Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 22 August 2019 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietf.org
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D6A12006A; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis@ietf.org, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@team.neustar>, iasa2-chairs@ietf.org, jon.peterson@team.neustar, iasa20@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <156644482393.25670.11013293875807553422.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:33:43 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/h0TbQov9q10hgOCeioezu_KTHrk>
Subject: [Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called “IASA 2.0” project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:33:44 -0000

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I have to say that I find the changes to the metadata stuff to be odd and
confusing, and would have preferred that 7776bis completely replace 7776
instead of trying to update it.  No action nor response needed here... just
wishing it had been handled differently.


Typo: “contained updated” should be “contained updates” in both the Abstract
 and Introduction.