[Iasa20] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 10 April 2019 15:58 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietf.org
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F701200CD;
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis@ietf.org,
Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, iasa2-chairs@ietf.org,
jon.peterson@neustar.biz, iasa20@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.95.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <155491193747.9448.3813845304640902463.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:58:57 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/jsZIo6JF_zrdhyrINft6frs1lJQ>
Subject: [Iasa20] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on
draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?=
<iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>,
<mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>,
<mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:58:58 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis/ There are no remarks associated with this position.
- [Iasa20] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ie… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker