IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] 6635bis

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sat, 27 April 2019 05:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7341200C4 for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=1CC/CMqQ; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=Q3oAEBdJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tbLMuoNs5jqQ for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007BC120006 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.226.55.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x3R5RRBc004307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1556342860; x=1556429260; bh=/X1cccDPsryFE8BcgXbkvyYIiOSgG5Ep5wgkY7fT9ng=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=1CC/CMqQdi3KrOhUA+HhFIm3Hg8eL/NhxlzeX4yp9Lskv1pi5eTwGNUgq2UBpOoOi IF7cW735oZoxwQ8IMTbL66jyBF4tC79OY6aAyxfdSm9eBivrL1pe7hexpSRgSDUS/s AXr6a7ccY3Qh1i6JjXCE/PG4UNQ56lVSRT0JQzjc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1556342860; x=1556429260; i=@elandsys.com; bh=/X1cccDPsryFE8BcgXbkvyYIiOSgG5Ep5wgkY7fT9ng=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Q3oAEBdJ4HAS9xz6gVLAWoBZJKcF7JYUjUmE4NvRDS3bJ5SZtkv6yBn9/mte/X7NE w0yF0IZvd4fZ1nhpvBHmbZSwXes7uAtDM3Vktiebz/mmSstUmmuHVzpjCxY9nnvs3g NJvXKJCnqdhaMbU7VZm1XOJBP0CgwkS9Zd2CJuVM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190426214842.0809f8a0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:26:43 -0700
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, iasa20@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <CCCFB260-660F-4CB9-AA4F-60F8B88465CB@sn3rd.com>
References: <CCCFB260-660F-4CB9-AA4F-60F8B88465CB@sn3rd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/kiqpx2Eq6wZ4o5plYlHAK-eOwvs>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] 6635bis
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called “IASA 2.0” project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 05:27:43 -0000

Hi Sean,
At 11:14 AM 25-04-2019, Sean Turner wrote:
>Hi!  While I am not sending this message on behalf of the IETF 
>Administration LLC, I have to admit that I am reading the IASA2.0 
>I-Ds with more interest as an LLC officer because I am somewhere 
>nearer the front of the go-to-jail line if something goes terribly wrong ;)

The legal document for the LLC defines how the business and affairs 
of the company will be managed.  My interpretation of that document 
is that a LLC Director would not be considered as an Officer of the LLC.

>The slant towards contracting made sense prior to forming the LLC, 
>but now that the LLC has been formed these functions could be 
>performed by an employee.  For any given role, the LLC might find it 
>preferable to have the role filled by an employee versus a 
>contractor for the purposes of being able to offer better benefits, 
>to more easily

I have not been following those administrative discussions about the 
IETF.  I agree with Brian's comment [1] about "lightweight" as that 
is, in my opinion, in line with what is stated in the IASA2 Charter.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/Fyj8-piL_ASKKEqUPgxQ9uAXOsg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email