Re: [Iasa20] 6635bis

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> Fri, 26 April 2019 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3194120476 for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rRQ3pG-w2hUI for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from copdcmhout02.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhout02.cable.comcast.com [96.114.158.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36AEE1203E1 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=comcast.com; s=20190412; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@comcast.com; t=1556307676; x=2420221276; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=iWHMCHz9ZcEG03czFWMCrKAOyymw1K1i1AuPv/hJSC4=; b=FdrAjvkW1r5NgQfpVRl9CEWCvo60fS/a3KXO/s/7xosWXhmbW+mhHEUJWrseKY1I ZwgbqqCpfyDa//aVbmt1sFgZ+S2FX1wlHVIFC44CXMYz9Ip+dglxSk9SmsWRGtcm PMBWn/43JdS/+XE7a6G0scURnT9+jNtLpKtViEWj/D4W3sZeZqI6iwb9n7r+2no1 ejrx8wHdYtt/2yXWwfa/yrLZ4+IL5+fRSv3jfPF459WsiMNvWFVTfqWSDavroSJD eqxR4UNraXTCy8z/2YoNA0NWDG9sEhUVVi5u/edSxhPHuuMzTlWyanlSUGwELejv FS5hlBWxwPxqA/pKHGqmLg==;
X-AuditID: 60729ed4-f05ff7000000add3-0d-5cc35edc24ce
Received: from copdcexc39.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhoutvip.cable.comcast.com [96.114.156.147]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by copdcmhout02.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id F8.48.44499.CDE53CC5; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:41:16 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.136) by copdcexc39.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:41:15 -0400
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94]) by COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94%15]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:41:15 -0400
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
CC: "iasa20@ietf.org" <iasa20@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Iasa20] 6635bis
Thread-Index: AQHU+5LF79eEJXtiYUi6XjZQJDHXOqZNuY+AgAEfTwA=
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 19:41:15 +0000
Message-ID: <DFC9E7D9-5126-42E1-9D89-56DD5631BCC5@cable.comcast.com>
References: <CCCFB260-660F-4CB9-AA4F-60F8B88465CB@sn3rd.com> <0A8ABED3-77B1-487C-BCCA-F1A4523DB9CF@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0A8ABED3-77B1-487C-BCCA-F1A4523DB9CF@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.18.0.190414
x-originating-ip: [68.87.29.7]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F612955A02212A429AB03E6728EE20C7@comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrAKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWSUDRnsu6duMMxBpMuKFlsfb+PzWLJ9I1M FldWNTI7MHvsnHWX3WPJkp9MHgcPMgYwRzUw2pRkFKUmlrikpqXmFafacSlgAJuk1LT8olTX xKKcyqDUnNRE7MpAKlNSczLLUov0sRqjj9WchC6mjIkPDjAVzOCo+DVdq4HxD3sXIyeHhICJ ROO590A2F4eQwC4mib6bZ1khnBYmib+dMxkhnNOMEks3NTKBtLAJmEncXXiFGcQWEXCWePfi GSOIzSygLvH7zAEwW1hAVuL5n81QNXISh4+8BYpzANlWEpfmOoOEWQRUJc5enQt2Ba+Ai8TJ O8tYQGwhgXyJvyu+gMU5BWwlfr16wwpiMwqISXw/tYYJYpW4xK0n85kgPhCQWLLnPDOELSrx 8vE/sHpRAX2JPQvuMELE5STmvr7HAnICs4CmxPpd+hBjrCQOXb0Mdb2ixJTuh1DnCEqcnPmE BaJVHOj6HawTGCVnIdk8C2HSLCSTZiGZNAvJpAWMrKsY+SzN9AwNTfQMTS30jAyNNjGC09G8 KzsYL0/3OMQowMGoxMMr4X44Rog1say4MvcQowQHs5IIr7rpwRgh3pTEyqrUovz4otKc1OJD jNIcLErivPKN+2OEBNITS1KzU1MLUotgskwcnFINjIde+VW4MFwIevz+Yi2Do0esSMjpf8UZ bI+eRlhrBfEznnL5nWg5jf90mcLWySZXJy82L3Jtbj14rK2s8Upg6JS+Uy92/f19KUsi0OGP 5MTjH/PfPZ51sWj5m2X3r/tfjJsZePoWs1jpemlFgwd/uA5sS9h+X7l+lllSnfbbqf+eXlrb aJjpe1yJpTgj0VCLuag4EQCbtLqpQwMAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/nIHvi5yddrFC4TxyMxGoMF510M8>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] 6635bis
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called “IASA 2.0” project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 19:41:20 -0000

On 4/25/19, 6:33 PM, "iasa20 on behalf of Bob Hinden" <iasa20-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
>    I also suspect that once the LLC has been in operation for a year or two, that there may be a range of things that the community will want to update. 
    
[JL] For sure -- the WG specified in 4071-bis a 3-year out retrospective - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-11#section-9 - so there will be a chance for revisiting things in the future based on what we learn in actual operation. That being said, it seems like if we identify small things that are obviously odd as we transition to the LLC - then we may as well try to fix them if we have consensus and get the relevant IETF/IAB reviews as well.