IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-09: (with COMMENT)

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 11 April 2019 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9287B1205F8; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WHv93tPhJd6M; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x12b.google.com (mail-it1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5F9E1203CD; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id k64so10829910itb.5; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pafY/QO+rsTn16FB5NwGSVoc/prwldAia1TkXcNUtYg=; b=o+5OWlxB8TxeEnkaHRMdNEZfjcrQw0xAQ08HB9Hd81DUuBjDfgZ+3hQKOMqgX2s+WL 4oz/TSu9c6mDVNKT+8fYl5IWP9WYDH9hiZGidKLFTxaRjfy03b8/UlsYc/IU/gifLa9i U/B6X04Tnt2+Zaolnt8AS0AkH44qgMYzpg9KN2ccwD+oV7udbUdy/lTsRHanlRxnidlq xo1aDXk1dY5yal2g2zlpMas+/m5Q1wwGq2qMcnj+YRQGKw02swBi3vs3EbCX1l+PuUWt z+BKdx76m2RLiWV8r5J/CxTLCSo1111ZFY2lIDrNvGMB3goEKiHzhnSLcqGUo44zKOq0 Zxow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pafY/QO+rsTn16FB5NwGSVoc/prwldAia1TkXcNUtYg=; b=PMNpeAmde5Rg33c49QEYDZ4+cV0En/ASEp/pKYiSS/8qtLcJ23XVOmSedaUVLCgVFr SxIpwYqEQ5DtGaH3aTn5xiLHhTXtenGcw++5OV992SUae3wuvTfu92FzV+9tu0ebrOZj AArmfAxT+IOiwlMXL6O2wig9ZGHv7OOgh/3/dckM8j8O2rUtc/ThfgvDGfO2i1DvLh7F DTglSUvDy2h6ZcIDOWb1cNOp5v1vPb4Ry8aS1IB/PN8VxSslNtKLBke+3zFK2v1bq4Dd NxvBkW8/JSaMKMF7+krjCbZ2S5Gm02qzywXiXaJ5QtJsr0Dv4wBYAzwqzF7ttcZ8Q1o/ T2Sg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWBa3CuPfngZoxYHT5d0xkpbDomEUMKbZviJvwUUEqD1OKO5maw yYy+l7dqww0kGfaeNwVJCzU3Sq07apgX/qnebDI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzRXLSdteETxLkA78tQx5rc4plmRprgkYCK7nEXP3idxaOjCwyu4OljceDBN5f+tY0hNH/pVM7PHy2D79bJz8s=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:198f:: with SMTP id b137mr9632021itb.105.1555003526881; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155498907076.25231.13801022071773065752.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABtrr-XbQkVvGykEMDnb9jyFxZaei39R=4KgbnBXsB5nsoermQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABtrr-W6qevLCOZPUgrMsARq+fVJr7zK2Z5X=j6xBZbZ9Tybag@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABtrr-W6qevLCOZPUgrMsARq+fVJr7zK2Z5X=j6xBZbZ9Tybag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:25:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMC+=3s8nuSp-KGooWL0DbgobUtFejwJNS4_nLN_EEPbsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d8269a05864478d3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/oGIQdhRMsZKHPJ27Iem5b3Mzq7s>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:25:31 -0000

Howdy,

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:48 AM Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:05 AM Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Section 7.7
>>>
>>>    The IETF LLC exists to support the IETF, IAB, and IRTF.  Therefore,
>>>    the IETF LLC's funding and all revenues, in-kind contributions, and
>>>    other income that comprise that funding shall be used solely to
>>>    support activities related to the IETF, IAB, IRTF, and RFC Editor,
>>>    and for no other purposes.
>>>
>>> Why are the lists in the first and second sentences different?
>>>
>>
>> Because the RFC Editor is contracted through the IAB, but that somewhere
>> in the WG discussion it felt important to call out in the second list. I
>> don't think we can just add the RFC Editor to the first list... but we
>> could do something like this: "The IETF LLC exists to support the IETF,
>> IRTF, and IAB (through which the RFC Editor receives support)."
>>
>
> Mirja pointed out correctly that the RFC Editor is contracted by the LLC,
> so I am wrong here. best, Joe
>

It's a bit more complicated than that, but since we are creating a 6635bis,
maybe leave this topic to the that?

Ted

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email