Re: [Iasa20] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 05 September 2019 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB1C1200D7; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 06:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=f8+cBVhK; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=W8CoKRXe
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ikyFYg0k3feJ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 06:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1FE7120091; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 06:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88F622778; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 09:48:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 05 Sep 2019 09:48:37 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=A LMs+cez7GIIGL9cu1lD2iGcumyoCo8Dd4nYMz6Fccc=; b=f8+cBVhKlP99P+V5P Rw/b+SVxMfOiwHd5mNre/7J0h3t0O7QQKbcuI9dgsWNgHSOC8t3MTHEP3YaBbT5S 8G6dt62jldC+x1VGI6kJIwGfnMSkfdUODuDuU17AmijRI70VI7gVEU9jDt/Q+0f7 +GWUV1nMnp3Ly1WS2XEAjRBBdfreNuok5mgYgtnl5EdebyTvdabLBWP+3UinGcYK a07JkCWnslVq1ROsr8bI+o3w4NaSMaGqa9e88iIa1qNX0xHfc4qN+ZtK1FxpVUET nfR+8gLel9JAtPxGT09FGv4+eWCx4n29h08h30dbU+LwQCYQeYF11hO6q0hAUvcl lkbrA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=ALMs+cez7GIIGL9cu1lD2iGcumyoCo8Dd4nYMz6Fc cc=; b=W8CoKRXe384vZURd1tzzf2xDs741fNJU5CyvUSzrECzAcOYG5/d5Ud4iR HmHrCDYv5UNndGfkrEkJEY+crzQJyZzWgpBSQ0QgwLSRUh9wA0g34Z5hs+Nt47To v1B3BagmAz0gl5UtExk8viE28Kco660L2irm4/2fC1X4yQUCXGOFAq2FsAcBSm5G 44a1SH65m28HxoBs9vjOOIxN21XYT3eN3O1k6O9jAxZziXd9znZdrleGAE0Se0s4 dKtLS+Xj56N7eioSManIymiUQVLraMDnIekVzCvOrpN3gaL1Fqq1qdpZvGb2q9XR T46bpEFWuKpgqGX+sV64mfDSHx77A==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:NRJxXQleMFKbrhLutM5sA7uA7b4z_WCrvrAq4f17f2y_MnWURsxmHw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudejjedgieefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomheptehlihhs shgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucffohhmrg hinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedujeefrdefkedruddujedrjeegnecurfgrrhgr mhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:NRJxXRZdDiQYrF_6qoaLVCCFiY6SuUS4GopI_ubAZef8Md5rT9sqUQ> <xmx:NRJxXd78kWwscXXEuOQjzSvyI7_QLBQC6eMBu7cYanaqdq0qDdlW3g> <xmx:NRJxXTDw_i5pajG4Edaszslgb9q7QojM1ezCwEK3wNkJCypNulppNA> <xmx:NRJxXW_JFTy1-TgRV-cu5-cOJlk3OtdZlino4KOmc7qwmZFbB3P5pg>
Received: from dhcp-10-150-9-161.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.74]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 58C5680061; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 09:48:37 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <156765837348.22833.8543872965442671295.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 09:48:36 -0400
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, jon.peterson@team.neustar, iasa20@ietf.org, iasa2-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ABE074B1-E7C4-4A74-B2EC-B4A3E92A1AEA@cooperw.in>
References: <156765837348.22833.8543872965442671295.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/qw_bXTTCmc0PxgYBealHYKDIYbg>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 13:48:41 -0000

Hi Ben,

> On Sep 5, 2019, at 12:39 AM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>; wrote:
> 
> Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I would like to discuss a little bit exactly what we want to happen to
> the metadata attached to RFC 7776.  It seems reasonable to apply the
> same "the logical updated version of the document has this new text not
> this old text" treatment we are giving the body contents to the bits at
> the top of the first page (to the extent that it is reasonable to do at
> all, viz. Magnus's Discuss).  But are we also asking for any of the
> "live" metadata in the indices associated with the RFC Series to change,
> even though that would bring them in conflict with the immutable RFC
> artifacts?

No. Just noting it as a logical consequence, I think.

Thanks,
Alissa

> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> It's also not entirely clear to me that we need to Update 7776 to remove
> the references to its updating of 7437, since
> RFC-7776-the-immutable-artifact does/did indeed update 7437; it's just
> that 7437 itself is no longer current/relevant.
> 
>