IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] Comments on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4844-bis-01

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 15 February 2019 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7096130FE2 for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:34:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sVuGYATpnDB7 for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:34:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23D77128BCC for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:34:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DD43004C7 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:16:18 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id I8F_A7MgmwCk for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:16:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-108-45-137-105.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.137.105]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 478D230017E; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:16:17 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <9B77B409-49CE-4CA6-AE82-20AA8A549D5F@thinkingcat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:34:33 -0500
Cc: IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DA4BED98-9190-4266-BFB0-C0136558FEFD@vigilsec.com>
References: <32C06675-C60B-4D6A-979A-FC3653E56D42@cooperw.in> <23C614C4-5C79-4355-9D74-2ED7D0DE63B2@vigilsec.com> <CAL02cgTzEQPTXyPL-ermABDne2G8F8UjbPpYADkyxxWHnVVf4g@mail.gmail.com> <a0a2ef94-335f-5ab6-e49c-7b1c985af3fc@cs.tcd.ie> <CAL02cgSnxB8-W_m13KM_HsSrE308vv5DuRJzt=t140G9JBdhUw@mail.gmail.com> <8873e4a0-a3d4-02b3-1c7b-28a9ea347165@joelhalpern.com> <CAL02cgQTzWtNVAWRZizFEekLDmapL7wOUMkJ0CWT_P_t3SDEtA@mail.gmail.com> <7436cbec-32a2-274d-7a22-b3db8388b10a@joelhalpern.com> <CAL02cgRGFXZY7+nPZx6eLoWjZ9o4RQ--aKs_seXbOfepiYBCpA@mail.gmail.com> <0C57D4C6-0F6D-47E9-81FC-3DE005FDDDFC@gmail.com> <AF8CFC90-9EA7-4B33-A548-202EBBF656CF@thinkingcat.com> <1FF265D9-2A7F-44E5-A9A1-C3594845A719@cooperw.in> <EE1DBF3E-17A6-4BB3-B544-2442AF2AA9A6@thinkingcat.com> <B98BC7A3-49BB-49A9-864C-3325E54DBF2C@cooperw.in> <9B77B409-49CE-4CA6-AE82-20AA8A549D5F@thinkingcat.com>
To: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/sRfKvOnC7dBrocggov0rvfqPMNU>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Comments on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4844-bis-01
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:34:38 -0000

Alissa and Leslie:

> I think those are fair points, and best considered, as suggested, after 6635bis is reviewed, too. I think the second para in my proposed text is the more substantive. In the first para quoted, it might be simple enough to s/operational oversight/contract oversight/.

I think the point is that IASA will manage any contracts that are needed to implement the RFC Editor functions.

I do not think anyone is trying to change the role performed by the IAB.

Russ

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email