[Iasa20] Suresh Krishnan's Yes on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-09: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 11 April 2019 02:50 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietf.org
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27AA01201CC; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis@ietf.org, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, iasa2-chairs@ietf.org, jon.peterson@neustar.biz, iasa20@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.95.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
Message-ID: <155495103208.22675.7881420403397531622.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:50:32 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/vJf2FQQl-uuP3TYhVnDY5rZYY80>
Subject: [Iasa20] Suresh Krishnan's Yes on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 02:50:32 -0000

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-09: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

* Section 1

s/Internet Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC)/IETF Administrative
Oversight Committee (IAOC)/

* Section 3

"maximum unilateral flexibility for the IETF LLC"

What does unilateral mean here? As opposed to what?

* Section 4.1

I would have thought IASA 2.0 would be defined using the definition currently
used for "IASA" and IASA would be defined as the obsoleted version of this
defined in RFC4071.

* Section 4.6

Since this talks about leadership a reference to IRSG may be more appropriate
than the IRTF as a whole?

* Section 6.5

It is not clear from this text if someone serves as a Board appointed director
for a term, whether they are eligible for two more terms using other methods or
only one more. I think this will be worth clarifying.

* Section 7.7

"The IETF LLC exists to support the IETF, IAB, and IRTF"

Not sure why the RFC Editor is left out here. Suggest changing to

"The IETF LLC exists to support the IETF, IAB, IRTF and the RFC Editor"