IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Icar] icar futures?

Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org> Thu, 14 October 2004 17:36 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA10214 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:36:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CI9hY-0007Yd-A3 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:47:45 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CI9KA-0004K4-P1; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:23:34 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CI9F6-0003IF-DM for icar@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:18:20 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA08973 for <icar@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:18:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CI9QI-0007BQ-Fr for icar@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:29:55 -0400
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2004 10:24:21 -0700
Received: from cisco.com ([128.107.174.137]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with SMTP id i9EHHjk2020882; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by cisco.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:17:41 -0400
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:17:41 -0400
From: Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org>
To: Robert Snively <rsnively@Brocade.COM>
Subject: Re: [Icar] icar futures?
Message-ID: <20041014171730.GA1368@sbrim-w2k01>
Mail-Followup-To: Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org>, Robert Snively <rsnively@Brocade.COM>, mallman@icir.org, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, icar@ietf.org
References: <66CFE0CA1DDEB54493E63A2C7C52924608CE52@hq-ex-6.brocade.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <66CFE0CA1DDEB54493E63A2C7C52924608CE52@hq-ex-6.brocade.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.0.111621
X-from-outside-Cisco: [128.107.174.137]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: icar@ietf.org, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, mallman@icir.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: icar-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007

On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 08:06:09AM -0700, Robert Snively allegedly wrote:
> The way to get meaningful reviews is to find those people who are
> truly interested and motivated.  
...
> Thus my continuing wish for
> active external liaison activities and broadly targeted solicitation
> of reviews.
> 
> Making a call for "reviewers" in general will usually have the results
> you have seen here.  Until you have a particular document that is
> important to a person, that person will simply not volunteer to review
> it.  IESG actions and arm-twisting activities will not change that
> meaningfully.  

Agreed.  So what I meant by going to the WGs directly was that we
solicit them to propose specific documents, and then we issue a call for
reviewers for those documents (or groups of documents).  Interesting
documents will get motivated reviewers (I hope?).  


_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email