IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Icar] ICAR draft charter rev 2

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org> Thu, 15 January 2004 02:27 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA26846 for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:27:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AgxE1-0008JJ-8k for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:27:13 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0F2RD7E031941 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:27:13 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AgxE1-0008J6-53 for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:27:13 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA26805 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:27:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AgxDy-0007hp-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:27:10 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AgxD5-0007g2-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:26:16 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AgxCo-0007dZ-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:25:58 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AgxCq-0007vg-4G; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:26:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AgxC1-0007in-JN for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:25:09 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA26736 for <icar@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:25:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AgxBy-0007cP-00 for icar@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:25:07 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AgxB3-0007am-00 for icar@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:24:10 -0500
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AgxAC-0007XV-00 for icar@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:23:16 -0500
Received: from dfnjgl21 (c-24-1-97-129.client.comcast.net[24.1.97.129]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2004011502224601500e2vr9e> (Authid: sdawkins@comcast.net); Thu, 15 Jan 2004 02:22:46 +0000
Message-ID: <003801c3db0e$7789a3c0$0400a8c0@DFNJGL21>
Reply-To: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
From: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
To: <icar@ietf.org>
References: <196108581021.20040108171716@psg.com>
Subject: Re: [Icar] ICAR draft charter rev 2
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:22:46 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Yeah, it's getting there - short note below.


>
>      It is an explicit goal of the WG to come up with mechanisms
>      encouraging earlier review of the documents. An early review is

I would like an explicit discussion of timing scope. Maybe words like
"It is an
explicit goal of the WG to come up with mechanisms encouraging review
of the documents at every stage of development - from drafts under
consideration for WG adoption (do I have this end right?) to drafts
being forwarded for publication"?

>      best for catching architectural problems while they're still
>      relatively easy to solve. In particular, many cross-functional
>      interactions can be spotted and dealt with, thus avoiding many
>      "late surprises". A final review (currently done by the IESG)
can
>      catch remaining cross-functional interactions, as well as deal
>      with overall quality issues.


_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email