IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Late review management (Re: [Icar] independence of reviews; variability)

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 10 March 2004 23:59 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA14965 for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:59:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1DbI-0003rF-20 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:59:00 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2ANx0XW014828 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:59:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1DbH-0003r5-PO for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:58:59 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA14947 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:58:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1DbE-0006TM-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:58:56 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1DaH-0006L2-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:57:58 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1DZK-0006Cv-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:56:58 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1DZM-0003kY-Vp; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:57:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1DYR-0003jV-Fk for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:56:03 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA14835 for <icar@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:55:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1DYO-00064o-00 for icar@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:56:00 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1DXW-0005wV-00 for icar@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:55:06 -0500
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1DX6-0005nv-00 for icar@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:54:41 -0500
Received: from halvestr-w2k1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D621C6223F; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:54:08 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:53:32 -0800
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Cc: icar@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Late review management (Re: [Icar] independence of reviews; variability)
Message-ID: <332932651.1078934012@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <161118984.20040310131612@brandenburg.com>
References: <1221060422.20040308164330@brandenburg.com> <035201c40588$c86cc840$0400a8c0@DFNJGL21> <227129254.1078828209@localhost> <161118984.20040310131612@brandenburg.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dave,

--On 10. mars 2004 13:16 -0800 Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> An interesting question is whether this potential disparity is a feature
> or a bug? The sort of rigid control you are promoting can be its own
> trap, for failing to detect problems.
>
> If a collection of independent reviewers holds an assessment that is
> markedly different that of one or more ADs, it might indicate a problem
> with some of the reviewers or with the ADs holding objections.

you heard it from me:

The right way to deal with ADs that are markedly at odds with IETF 
consensus is to correct them, reeducate them or fire them.

Not building baroque structures of multiple incompatible control functions 
in order to minimize the damage they can do.

Nit: I never used the word "rigid". That was not an accident.

                   Harald




_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email