IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Icar] Summary of Discussion on Reforming IETF Quality Control Process

"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Sat, 10 January 2004 01:04 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA02627 for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:04:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Af7Xe-0000yh-87 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:03:54 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0A13scO003758 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:03:54 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Af7Xe-0000yX-2K for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:03:54 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA02594 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:03:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Af7Xc-0001g7-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:03:52 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Af7Vi-0001bK-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:01:54 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Af7Tu-0001X8-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:00:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Af7Tt-0000tf-Fu; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:00:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Af7Cb-0000Xy-KR for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:42:09 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA02010 for <icar@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:42:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Af7CZ-0000ne-00 for icar@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:42:07 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Af7Aj-0000i8-00 for icar@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:40:13 -0500
Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Af7AA-0000by-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:39:38 -0500
Message-ID: <029201c3d712$48293870$606015ac@dclkempt40>
From: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: <solutions@alvestrand.no>, "MPowr" <mpowr@ietf.org>, <icar@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:40:01 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Icar] Summary of Discussion on Reforming IETF Quality Control Process
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I've written a draft summarizing the discussions on reforming the IETF
quality control process that started on mpowr in December and wandered to
solutions in January. It's here:

http://www.geocities.com/kempf42/draft-list-quality-control-00.txt

I am not exactly sure what to do with the draft at this point, but would be
interested in hearing feedback. There has been a preference expressed for
discussing the issue on solutions rather than on either mpowr or icar, but
I'm on all three lists and I'll try to respond as time allows. I'd also be
interested in hearing suggestions about how to proceed. If this doesn't look
like a valuable activity, we should apply the procedure described in the
draft and terminate it early. :-)

            jak


_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email