Re: [Icar] independence of reviews; variability

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Tue, 09 March 2004 04:10 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA19920 for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:10:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0YZN-0006yQ-B2 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:10:17 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i294AHZt026805 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:10:17 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0YZM-0006yG-Ri for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:10:16 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA19910 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:10:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0YZI-0007UU-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:10:12 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0YYC-0007E7-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:09:06 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0YX7-00073s-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:07:57 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0YXA-0006jB-85; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:08:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0YWW-0006YC-G2 for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:07:20 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA19838 for <icar@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:07:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0YWR-00072J-00 for icar@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:07:15 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0YVM-0006tM-00 for icar@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:06:10 -0500
Received: from adsl-68-76-113-50.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net ([68.76.113.50] helo=guns.icir.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0YUK-0006cU-00 for icar@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:05:04 -0500
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (adsl-68-76-113-50.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [68.76.113.50]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F7F77AA3D; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:04:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175D510F427; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:04:24 -0500 (EST)
To: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
Cc: icar@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Icar] independence of reviews; variability
In-Reply-To: <035201c40588$c86cc840$0400a8c0@DFNJGL21>
Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR)
Song-of-the-Day: Moondance
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:04:23 -0500
Message-Id: <20040309040424.175D510F427@lawyers.icir.org>
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

 
> If we don't think anyone except area directors reads documents any
> more, discussion about "reviewers inside/outside the management
> structure" might make sense. I had hoped that we would not be starting
> down that road.

I believe the spirit of the ICAR charter is that we should think more
along the lines of *early* review -- which my mind thinks of as "way
before the IESG sees a document".  I was unclear about whether Dave's
comments were about early review or late review or just plain review.
But, I am pretty sure the above is about later review.  Am I off on the
spirit of ICAR?  And, if we're scoped on early review does that help the
independence issue?

allman
(w/o co-chair hat)


--
Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/