RE: [Icar] an early review experiment

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Tue, 18 May 2004 21:17 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (www.iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA19499 for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 17:17:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQBq8-0001Kw-Nq for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 17:09:33 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i4IL9W1d005134 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 17:09:32 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQBbe-00055B-Su for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:54:34 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA17709 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:54:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BQBbc-0003E0-Rh for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:54:32 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BQBap-000365-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:53:43 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BQBZd-0002um-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:52:29 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQBOc-0007gp-OC; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:41:06 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQAWP-0006zi-3y for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 15:45:05 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10020 for <icar@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 15:45:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BQAWN-0002CA-Ld for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 15:45:03 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BQAVQ-00027y-00 for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 15:44:05 -0400
Received: from hoemail2.lucent.com ([192.11.226.163] helo=hoemail2.firewall.lucent.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BQAUR-00021G-00 for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 15:43:03 -0400
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com [135.85.76.62]) by hoemail2.firewall.lucent.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i4IJgRc03303 for <icar@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 14:42:27 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <JB9TP98Z>; Tue, 18 May 2004 21:42:29 +0200
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550455911D@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: mallman@icir.org, icar@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Icar] an early review experiment
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 21:42:28 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

I think that instead of "early review" you mean "early cross area review"
(i.e. icar) in the below. Do I have that correct?

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Allman [mailto:mallman@icir.org]
> Sent: dinsdag 18 mei 2004 20:03
> To: icar@ietf.org
> Subject: [Icar] an early review experiment
> 
> 
>  
> Folks-
> 
> Joel and I chatted with some folks from the change process 
> coordination
> team this afternoon.  We would really like to get some 
> discussion going
> on the mailing list with regards to moving ahead on *an* early review
> experiment.  Our sense is that even though there are several documents
> in the early review space that there is an intersection among 
> them that
> people would like to see, but that has not yet emerged in a concrete
> way.  In an effort to push along the conversation we are going to ask
> some broad sorts of question below to try to synthesize 
> thoughts into an
> experimental design.  If this doesn't work (for whatever reason) our
> fallback is to try to take each concrete proposal and beat it 
> into shape
> and try experiments with all that we can beat into enough shape to do
> so.  
> 
> In that context, the broad questions that we'd like to discuss are:
> 
>   + At what point should early review happen?  Pre-WG 
> document?  WG -00
>     document?  Pre-WGLC?  All of the above?  Other?
> 
>   + Who is responsible for finding reviewers for a document?
> 
>   + From what pool are the reviewers drawn?
> 
>   + Precisely, what is produced?
> 
>   + What does a reviewer do with a review?
> 
>   + What other things need nailed down before we can think about an
>     experiment?
> 
> (And, note, some of these are thrown out for completeness and 
> we believe
> there is decent consensus on the answer - e.g., the "what to do with a
> review?" question.)
> 
> Discussion would be appreciated!
> 
> allman
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/
> 
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar