RE: [Icar] an early review experiment
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Tue, 18 May 2004 21:17 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (www.iesg.org [132.151.1.19])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA19499
for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 17:17:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQBq8-0001Kw-Nq
for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 17:09:33 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost)
by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i4IL9W1d005134
for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 17:09:32 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQBbe-00055B-Su
for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:54:34 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA17709
for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:54:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx)
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BQBbc-0003E0-Rh
for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:54:32 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1BQBap-000365-00
for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:53:43 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19])
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BQBZd-0002um-00
for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:52:29 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1BQBOc-0007gp-OC; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:41:06 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQAWP-0006zi-3y
for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 15:45:05 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10020
for <icar@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 15:45:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx)
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BQAWN-0002CA-Ld
for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 15:45:03 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1BQAVQ-00027y-00
for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 15:44:05 -0400
Received: from hoemail2.lucent.com ([192.11.226.163]
helo=hoemail2.firewall.lucent.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1BQAUR-00021G-00
for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 15:43:03 -0400
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com
[135.85.76.62])
by hoemail2.firewall.lucent.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id
i4IJgRc03303
for <icar@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 14:42:27 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2657.72) id <JB9TP98Z>; Tue, 18 May 2004 21:42:29 +0200
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550455911D@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: mallman@icir.org, icar@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Icar] an early review experiment
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 21:42:28 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>,
<mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>,
<mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
I think that instead of "early review" you mean "early cross area review" (i.e. icar) in the below. Do I have that correct? Thanks, Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Allman [mailto:mallman@icir.org] > Sent: dinsdag 18 mei 2004 20:03 > To: icar@ietf.org > Subject: [Icar] an early review experiment > > > > Folks- > > Joel and I chatted with some folks from the change process > coordination > team this afternoon. We would really like to get some > discussion going > on the mailing list with regards to moving ahead on *an* early review > experiment. Our sense is that even though there are several documents > in the early review space that there is an intersection among > them that > people would like to see, but that has not yet emerged in a concrete > way. In an effort to push along the conversation we are going to ask > some broad sorts of question below to try to synthesize > thoughts into an > experimental design. If this doesn't work (for whatever reason) our > fallback is to try to take each concrete proposal and beat it > into shape > and try experiments with all that we can beat into enough shape to do > so. > > In that context, the broad questions that we'd like to discuss are: > > + At what point should early review happen? Pre-WG > document? WG -00 > document? Pre-WGLC? All of the above? Other? > > + Who is responsible for finding reviewers for a document? > > + From what pool are the reviewers drawn? > > + Precisely, what is produced? > > + What does a reviewer do with a review? > > + What other things need nailed down before we can think about an > experiment? > > (And, note, some of these are thrown out for completeness and > we believe > there is decent consensus on the answer - e.g., the "what to do with a > review?" question.) > > Discussion would be appreciated! > > allman > > > -- > Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/ > > > > _______________________________________________ Icar mailing list Icar@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar
- [Icar] an early review experiment Mark Allman
- RE: [Icar] an early review experiment Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Pekka Savola
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Melinda Shore
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Melinda Shore
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Alex Rousskov
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Pekka Savola
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Allison Mankin
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Alex Rousskov
- [Icar] ICAR charter scope and review management Alex Rousskov
- [Icar] Re: ICAR charter scope and review manageme… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Melinda Shore
- Re: [Icar] Re: ICAR charter scope and review mana… Alex Rousskov
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Alex Rousskov
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [Icar] an early review experiment Mark Allman