Re: [Icar] ICAR draft charter rev 2

Spencer,

  Rev 3 I posted last night expands a bit more on this:

      It is an explicit goal of the WG to come up with mechanisms
      encouraging early review of the documents while ideas are still
      in the formation stage...

  I know it's not exactly what you suggest, but it does answer the
  question of "how early" that was asked several times.

-- 
Alex
http://www.psg.com/~zinin/

Wednesday, January 14, 2004, 6:22:46 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> Yeah, it's getting there - short note below.

>>
>>      It is an explicit goal of the WG to come up with mechanisms
>>      encouraging earlier review of the documents. An early review is

> I would like an explicit discussion of timing scope. Maybe words like
> "It is an
> explicit goal of the WG to come up with mechanisms encouraging review
> of the documents at every stage of development - from drafts under
> consideration for WG adoption (do I have this end right?) to drafts
> being forwarded for publication"?

>>      best for catching architectural problems while they're still
>>      relatively easy to solve. In particular, many cross-functional
>>      interactions can be spotted and dealt with, thus avoiding many
>>      "late surprises". A final review (currently done by the IESG)
> can
>>      catch remaining cross-functional interactions, as well as deal
>>      with overall quality issues.

> _______________________________________________
> Icar mailing list
> Icar@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar