Re: [Icar] icar futures?

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Tue, 16 November 2004 14:44 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA03462 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:44:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU4bg-0006yU-Nm for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:46:56 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CU4VX-0005qm-J2; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:40:35 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CU4LF-0003zT-Rh for icar@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:29:57 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA02438 for <icar@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:29:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from wyvern.icir.org ([192.150.187.14]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU4NT-0006eT-AU for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:32:15 -0500
Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-68-76-113-50.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [68.76.113.50]) by wyvern.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iAGETt29008852; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 06:29:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mallman@guns.icir.org)
Received: from guns.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5409577AA12; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:29:54 -0500 (EST)
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
Subject: Re: [Icar] icar futures?
In-Reply-To: <0a1c01c4b979$20412c60$0200a8c0@DFNJGL21>
Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR)
Song-of-the-Day: Eight Days a Week
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:29:54 -0500
Message-Id: <20041116142954.5409577AA12@guns.icir.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Cc: icar@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1458936207=="
Sender: icar-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3

> My sponsoring organization really liked the marketing aspects of
> supporting "Senior Internet Reviewers". I can explain to my sponsoring
> organization why I participate in directorates, and I can explain why
> I participate in an Area Review Team. Given a finite number of hours
> in the day...

I want to drill on this.  I don't get it at all.

I can see the obvious appeal of "senior...".  But, the rest of the above
you say you can "explain" (e.g., you can explain participation in a
directorate (that does not have a sexy name)).  So, if you can explain
and justify directorate work then why can't you explain ICAR work?  I am
trying to figure out if there is something fundamental here that is
causing problems.

Thanks!

allman



_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar