Re: [Icar] icar futures?

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Tue, 16 November 2004 16:02 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA13049 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:02:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU5pB-0000Up-6l for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:04:58 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CU5kg-0000Oi-Lu; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:00:18 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CU5g3-00083B-Mr for icar@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:55:32 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA12258 for <icar@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:55:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from wyvern.icir.org ([192.150.187.14]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU5iG-0000KF-Aj for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:57:50 -0500
Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-68-76-113-50.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [68.76.113.50]) by wyvern.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iAGFtO29009791; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:55:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mallman@guns.icir.org)
Received: from guns.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7740E77AA12; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:55:23 -0500 (EST)
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
Subject: Re: [Icar] icar futures?
In-Reply-To: <419A214C.5040509@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR)
Song-of-the-Day: Eight Days a Week
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:55:23 -0500
Message-Id: <20041116155523.7740E77AA12@guns.icir.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 69a74e02bbee44ab4f8eafdbcedd94a1
Cc: icar@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0705008731=="
Sender: icar-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5a9a1bd6c2d06a21d748b7d0070ddcb8

> My guess is that to corporate suits, "directorate" sounds like a
> control point and "review" sounds passive. If we can find a way of
> making "review" sound as important as we believe it to be, that will
> help.

ICAR Directorate?

I understand that the name is not sexy.  But, I my question to Spencer
stands because he said he could "explain" other activities enough to
justify them, but seemed to indicate that may not be the case with
ICAR.  And, so I am wondering if it's a sexiness thing or whether it's
more fundamental.

Thanks,
allman


--
Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/



_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar