Re: [Icar] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-zinin-icar-arts-00.txt

Hi, Harald,

Actually, I WAS hoping for a slightly larger crowd, but only slightly
larger - if I understood Brian, he suggested including working group
document editors in the rugby scrum, along with ADs and WG chairs. My
apologies for the inadvertant "everyone" in the second paragraph.

Now that we don't have more authors than lines on the first page of a
draft, editors should be a bit LESS scary... but, as I'm looking at
what I'm typing, some of the twenty-author drafts needed review the
most, don't you think?

Spencer

From: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no>

> --On 26. mars 2004 06:48 -0600 Spencer Dawkins
<spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
> wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I read almost all Brian's comments as "somebody besides ADs
and
> > WG chairs needs to be worried about getting review that is wide
enough
> > and early enough, and document authors/editors are the obvious
> > stuckees". I agree.
> >
> > It's pretty tempting to slap out a proposal that assumes that the
> > management structure needs to do something, but we'd be better off
if
> > everyone contributed. I know it's hard to step back, but I'd ask
> > people to try to think about ICAR as a community responsibility,
and
> > not just another thing for ADs and WG chairs to worry about.
>
> agree heartily with the sentiment, but I'm afraid of the crowd
syndrome -
> if everyone's responsible, nobody's responsible. And the WG chair
*has* to
> know what's happening to the WG's documents.

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar