IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Icar] icar futures?

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Wed, 17 November 2004 09:37 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA04729 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 04:37:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUMI1-00041m-P2 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 04:39:51 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CUMED-0006Qp-Hl; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 04:35:53 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CUM4i-0003sW-Bg for icar@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 04:26:04 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA03457 for <icar@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 04:26:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mtagate2.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.151]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUM74-0003ht-Uh for icar@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 04:28:32 -0500
Received: from d12nrmr1707.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1707.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.81]) by mtagate2.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAH9PJxD031832; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:25:19 GMT
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.213]) by d12nrmr1707.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id iAH9PLKS035250; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:25:21 +0100
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-132-76.de.ibm.com [9.145.132.76]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA69418; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:25:17 +0100
Message-ID: <419B18FC.1080203@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:25:16 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mallman@icir.org
Subject: Re: [Icar] icar futures?
References: <20041116155523.7740E77AA12@guns.icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041116155523.7740E77AA12@guns.icir.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: icar@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: icar-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Mark Allman wrote:
>>My guess is that to corporate suits, "directorate" sounds like a
>>control point and "review" sounds passive. If we can find a way of
>>making "review" sound as important as we believe it to be, that will
>>help.
> 
> 
> ICAR Directorate?
> 
> I understand that the name is not sexy.  But, I my question to Spencer
> stands because he said he could "explain" other activities enough to
> justify them, but seemed to indicate that may not be the case with
> ICAR.  And, so I am wondering if it's a sexiness thing or whether it's
> more fundamental.

Cross Area Review Directorate

(Has the advantage of reviving one of the buzzwords from SIRs.)

     Brian

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email