IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Icar] icar futures?

Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org> Wed, 13 October 2004 18:52 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA23719 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:52:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHoPK-0002mQ-UU for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:03:32 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CHo91-0007yP-Ba; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:46:39 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CHo4a-0006iU-R1 for icar@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:42:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA23085 for <icar@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:42:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHoFa-0002ar-Ma for icar@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:53:27 -0400
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2004 11:50:29 -0700
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from cisco.com (dhcp-171-71-193-217.cisco.com [171.71.193.217]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with SMTP id i9DIfTOE016485; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by cisco.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:41:31 -0400
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:41:30 -0400
From: Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org>
To: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
Subject: Re: [Icar] icar futures?
Message-ID: <20041013184130.GC1128@sbrim-w2k01>
Mail-Followup-To: Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org>, Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>, icar@ietf.org
References: <20041013172154.9291677AE41@guns.icir.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20041013172154.9291677AE41@guns.icir.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Cc: icar@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1307427210=="
Sender: icar-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 01:21:54PM -0400, Mark Allman allegedly wrote:
> This doesn't look like a lovely picture to me.  This really smells
> like ICAR is something the community does not want.  Or, at least does
> not want to put their energy into, in practice.  Joel and I would
> appreciate any thoughts on moving forward (and, saying "ok, it didn't
> work" **is** a path forward).

I still think it's the right idea, I think people are just busy.  Let's
poll the wg-chairs and see where they stand.  We don't need the IESG, we
can find an initial set of WGs ourselves, eh?

swb

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email