IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Icar] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-icar-xarea-00.txt

Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com> Mon, 19 April 2004 17:10 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA24202 for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:10:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFcDE-00012p-MB for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:05:40 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3JH5eOH004009 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:05:40 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFcBq-0000kK-U8 for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:04:14 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA23848 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:04:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BFcBp-0002oY-1F for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:04:13 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BFcAu-0002bM-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:03:16 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BFcAM-0002Nu-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:02:42 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFc2u-0007FV-Jw; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:55:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFbwN-0005MT-LX for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:48:15 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA22931 for <icar@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:48:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BFbwL-0006s4-Qb for icar@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:48:13 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BFbvN-0006eU-00 for icar@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:47:14 -0400
Received: from measurement-factory.com ([206.168.0.5]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BFbuw-0006RI-00 for icar@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:46:46 -0400
Received: from measurement-factory.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by measurement-factory.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i3JGkiuH088531; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:46:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from rousskov@measurement-factory.com)
Received: (from rousskov@localhost) by measurement-factory.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i3JGki7n088530; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:46:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from rousskov)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:46:44 -0600 (MDT)
From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
cc: icar WG <icar@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Icar] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-icar-xarea-00.txt
In-Reply-To: <001601c42603$e8de0bc0$0300a8c0@DFNJGL21>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0404191032021.84525@measurement-factory.com>
References: <200404152040.QAA25508@ietf.org> <408389DB.CEE7850E@zurich.ibm.com> <001601c42603$e8de0bc0$0300a8c0@DFNJGL21>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Spencer Dawkins wrote:

> At some point, having a single cross-area review board makes more
> sense. I'm not sure whether we are at that point or not,

Spencer,

Could you please clarify what is the axis along which we may
eventually reach the point where "a single cross-area review board
makes more sense"? The size of the IETF? The number of reviewers? The
number of good pool managers available? Something else?

> but I'd like us to make that decision, instead of assuming a single
> review board is obviously the wrong thing to do, and an area-based
> structure is the only choice.

FWIW, I believe that a single review board/pool for early and late
cross-area review is at least worth seriously considering. Reviewers
will have an option to augment their public profiles with their areas
of expertise, of course.


Perhaps somebody with a lot of IETF experience can post an unbiased
(i.e., avoiding adjectives) list of pros/cons for a single pool and
segregated boards options?

Thanks,

Alex.

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email