RE: [Icar] Re: WG Action: Improved Cross-Area Review (icar)
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Tue, 17 February 2004 10:54 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA23146
for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:54:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1At2rV-0007E8-Nz
for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:53:58 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost)
by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1HArv0R027776
for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:53:57 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1At2rV-0007Dv-IW
for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:53:57 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA23101
for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:53:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1At2rR-0005Bv-00
for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:53:54 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1At2qU-00056z-00
for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:52:55 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19])
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1At2pa-00052g-00
for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:51:58 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1At2pd-00079M-3L; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:52:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1At2pb-00078v-Jp
for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:51:59 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA22994
for <icar@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:51:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1At2pY-00052J-00
for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:51:56 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1At2oc-0004yU-00
for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:50:58 -0500
Received: from hoemail2.lucent.com ([192.11.226.163]
helo=hoemail2.firewall.lucent.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1At2nk-0004t9-00
for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:50:04 -0500
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com
[135.85.76.62])
by hoemail2.firewall.lucent.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id
i1HAnWr14916
for <icar@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 04:49:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2657.72) id <16980NK8>; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:49:30 +0100
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155039627E2@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com>, icar@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Icar] Re: WG Action: Improved Cross-Area Review (icar)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:49:26 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>,
<mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>,
<mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
> Meanwhile, we are trying to plan the agenda. Folks who would like to > present issues or ideas for discussion (not just a presentation of a draft, > preferably presentation of issues and aspects of ideas that of come up on > the list, to be followed by discussion with the room) should send email to > the list or to me and Mark. > Although the ICAR session seems to conflict with another WG I want/must be, I should be able to find some time to report on the experience we have with MIB Doctor review and do some discussion with the WG members as to what works and does not work (both from the MIB Doctor viewpoint, the AD viewpoint, and hopefully also from the other WGs and editors viewpoints). The relevant document is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-02.txt Bert > Yours, > Joel M. Halpern _______________________________________________ Icar mailing list Icar@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar
- [Icar] Re: WG Action: Improved Cross-Area Review … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Icar] Re: WG Action: Improved Cross-Area Rev… Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] Re: WG Action: Improved Cross-Area Rev… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: [Icar] Re: WG Action: Improved Cross-Area Rev… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: [Icar] Re: WG Action: Improved Cross-Area Rev… Spencer Dawkins