Re: [Icar] Reviewers: One single group or per-area groups?
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 13 January 2004 18:43 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA02507
for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:43:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AgTUl-00045a-Rs
for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:42:32 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost)
by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0DIgVEg015717
for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:42:31 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AgTUl-00045Q-Nm
for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:42:31 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA02447
for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:42:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1AgTUf-00049W-00
for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:42:25 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1AgTSt-00042m-00
for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:40:35 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org)
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AgTRL-0003ud-00
for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:39:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1AgTRN-0003Yk-Bw; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:39:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AgTQv-0003Wr-S4
for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:38:33 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA02121
for <icar@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:38:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1AgTQt-0003qb-00
for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:38:31 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1AgTP3-0003kZ-00
for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:36:38 -0500
Received: from joy.songbird.com ([208.184.79.7])
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AgTNQ-0003dN-00
for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:34:56 -0500
Received: from bbprime (jay.songbird.com [208.184.79.253])
by joy.songbird.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i0DIfqc21325;
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:41:52 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
To: <MAP@MAP-NE.com>, <icar@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: PocoMail 3.03 (1740) - EVALUATION VERSION
X-URL: http://www.pocomail.com/
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:34:05 -0800
Message-ID: <200411310345.801759@bbprime>
In-Reply-To: <20040113131211.7AD0A3F746@Mail.MAP-NE.com>
Subject: Re: [Icar] Reviewers: One single group or per-area groups?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>,
<mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>,
<mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Michael, > I, personally, do not consider myself tied to any area. There is no > area in the IETF in which more than a few of the WGs are interesting > to me and there is no area in the IETF in which I have not been an > active participant in at least one WG at some point. I like this perspective a lot. I've been concerned that reviewers be independent of ADs, but had not thought that an even deeper point is that senior IETF contributors nearly always are cross- (or multi-) area. > I think one of the most important goals of this group is generalized > cross-fertilization, and it's just the sort of generalists who > wouldn't be part of an area-specific group, but might be part of a > single group, who can, possibly, offer the most in such an effort. > So, in that regard, there's probably a fair amount of difference > between those two organizational structures. They will encourage > different classes of people to participate. Nicely said, and many thanks for saying it. d/ -- Dave Crocker <dcrocker-at-brandenburg-dot-com> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://brandenburg.com> _______________________________________________ Icar mailing list Icar@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar
- [Icar] Summary of Discussion on Reforming IETF Qu… James Kempf
- [Icar] Re: [Solutions] Summary of Discussion on R… Margaret Wasserman
- [Icar] Re: [Solutions] Summary of Discussion on R… James Kempf
- [Icar] Re: [Solutions] Summary of Discussion on R… Alex Rousskov
- [Icar] Re: [Solutions] Summary of Discussion on R… Joel M. Halpern
- [Icar] Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Summary of Dis… Margaret Wasserman
- [Icar] Assessing wg risk and criticality Dave Crocker
- [Icar] Re: [Solutions] Summary of Discussion on R… Alex Rousskov
- [Icar] Re: [Solutions] Summary of Discussion on R… Alex Rousskov
- [Icar] Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Summary of Dis… Alex Rousskov
- [Icar] Reviewers: One single group or per-area gr… Michael A. Patton
- Re: [Icar] Reviewers: One single group or per-are… Dave Crocker
- Re: [Icar] Reviewers: One single group or per-are… Alex Rousskov
- Re: [Icar] Reviewers: One single group or per-are… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [Icar] Reviewers: One single group or per-are… Alex Rousskov