Re: [Icar] Progress?
Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Tue, 20 April 2004 03:43 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA03313
for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:43:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFm3H-0007w8-9a
for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:36:03 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost)
by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3K3a3L6030502
for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:36:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFlzJ-0006ij-36
for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:31:57 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA02566
for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:31:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx)
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BFlzH-0003wW-1a
for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:31:55 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1BFly8-0003g0-00
for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:30:44 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19])
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BFlxc-0003QY-00
for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:30:12 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1BFlqh-0004l5-IL; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:23:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFllO-0003WB-Al
for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:17:34 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA01663
for <icar@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:17:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx)
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BFllM-0000Fr-9k
for icar@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:17:32 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1BFlkU-00001U-00
for icar@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:16:39 -0400
Received: from wyvern.icir.org ([192.150.187.14])
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BFljg-0007Ze-00
for icar@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:15:48 -0400
Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-68-76-113-50.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net
[68.76.113.50])
by wyvern.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i3K3FmsM003448;
Mon, 19 Apr 2004 20:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from mallman@icir.org)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (adsl-68-76-113-50.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net
[68.76.113.50]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2B45277A6D5; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:15:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6C3F213AF5E; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:15:45 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
Cc: icar@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Icar] Progress?
In-Reply-To: <007a01c42678$04c002c0$0300a8c0@DFNJGL21>
Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR)
Song-of-the-Day: Jungle Love
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:15:45 -0400
Message-Id: <20040420031545.6C3F213AF5E@lawyers.icir.org>
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>,
<mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>,
<mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
> > I'm not so sure. That would depend on the characteristics of the > > process that one believes should be different. I do not recall > > seeing arguments against points of the SIRS structure or in favor of > > alternative designs, that argue for superiority of results. > > I may be incorrectly channeling Mark, but I took his comment about > doing things differently as having more to do with not punting after > four months than about changing SIR structure, etc. Yeah, Dave and I worked through this off-list and you're exactly right Spencer. I was not making a comment on the soundness of the SIRS proposal, just on the actual experiment with it (with the major point being that more experience would be better). Thanks for making this more clear Spencer. allman -- Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/
- [Icar] Progress? Joel M. Halpern
- Links to experiments (Re: [Icar] Progress?) Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [Icar] Progress? Dave Crocker
- Re: [Icar] Progress? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Icar] Progress? Dave Crocker
- Re: Links to experiments (Re: [Icar] Progress?) Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] Progress? Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] Progress? Dave Crocker
- Re: [Icar] Progress? Mark Allman
- archiving reviews (Re: [Icar] Progress?) Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] Progress? Dave Crocker
- Re: [Icar] Progress? Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [Icar] Progress? Mark Allman
- RE: [Icar] Progress? Robert Snively