RE: Late review management (Re: [Icar] independence of reviews; variability)

"Robert Snively" <rsnively@Brocade.COM> Fri, 12 March 2004 16:05 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA29821 for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:05:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1p9I-0007XZ-Nd for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:04:37 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2CG4aWH028984 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:04:36 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1p9I-0007XP-GJ for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:04:36 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA29806 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:04:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1p9F-0001ly-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:04:33 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1p8L-0001fM-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:03:37 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1p7j-0001Yg-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:02:59 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1p7l-0007Q8-1G; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:03:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1p7X-0007OE-Ud for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:02:47 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA29772 for <icar@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:02:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1p7U-0001YI-00 for icar@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:02:44 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1p6W-0001Qc-00 for icar@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:01:44 -0500
Received: from f112.brocade.com ([66.243.153.112] helo=blasphemy.brocade.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1p6C-0001IF-00 for icar@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:01:24 -0500
Received: from hq-ex-11.corp.brocade.com (hq-ex-11 [192.168.38.58]) by blasphemy.brocade.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE929141F4; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:00:52 -0800 (PST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Late review management (Re: [Icar] independence of reviews; variability)
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:00:52 -0800
Message-ID: <191DA4FAE235D24C9BCC8D50F6B17AB906EAF9@hq-ex-11.corp.brocade.com>
Thread-Topic: Late review management (Re: [Icar] independence of reviews; variability)
Thread-Index: AcQHmbN7ApSFjhHKRRCDEKgDvoD1rgAsL9UA
From: "Robert Snively" <rsnively@Brocade.COM>
To: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no>, <erosen@cisco.com>
Cc: <icar@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am totally in agreement with Harald's statement below.

> While I believe less in the power of political 
> agendas than you do, I believe that getting more 
> reviewers into the process makes it FAR 
> easier to see the difference between an AD (or any process 
> gatekeeper) raising a concern that is widely shared 
> in the community and raising a 
> concern that has no backing.
> 
> It is one reason why I believe archiving reviews is an 
> *essential* part of the process.
> 
>                              Harald

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar