[Icar] Input based on SIRS experience

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Fri, 09 January 2004 14:51 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA02414 for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:51:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AexyP-0000l0-5R for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:50:53 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i09EordI002904 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:50:53 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AexyO-0000kl-WD for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:50:53 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA02395 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:50:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AexyN-0005eZ-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:50:51 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AexwT-0005bA-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:48:54 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aexue-0005YD-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:47:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aexue-0000iH-KG; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:47:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AexuY-0000hq-OQ for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:46:56 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA02361 for <icar@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:46:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AexuW-0005XC-00 for icar@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:46:52 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Aexsh-0005UO-00 for icar@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:44:59 -0500
Received: from auemail1.lucent.com ([192.11.223.161] helo=auemail1.firewall.lucent.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AexsV-0005Qp-00 for icar@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:44:47 -0500
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com [135.85.76.62]) by auemail1.firewall.lucent.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id i09Ei9g29737 for <icar@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:44:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <ZPPAF1DN>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:44:07 +0100
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155033D3AAA@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: "Icar (E-mail)" <icar@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:44:02 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: [Icar] Input based on SIRS experience
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

Forwarded with permission.
But probably only usefull after a WG gets instantiated.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brc@zurich.ibm.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 9 januari 2004 11:40
> To: James Kempf
> Cc: dcrocker@brandenburg.com; solutions@alvestrand.no
> Subject: Re: [Solutions] SIRS dismissed as a failure
>
>
> My opinion is that we didn't generate enough interaction with
> the ADs over SIRs, and part of this was due to a technical gap -
> there was no link between the I-D tracker and the reviews. So I
> think it is very important for the real review system that it is
> somehow linked to the I-D (and hence to the I-D tracker) via
> the ietf.org web site. So that if you have the name of an I-D,
> you can not only find its status from the tracker, but also
> its reviews. They then become a real evaluation tool.
>
>    Brian

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar