Re: [Icar] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-zinin-icar-arts-00.txt

[Mark Allman <[e-mail]>]

> The i-d-announce list is the DDoS attack today. 

Bingo.  This was my point.  No matter what web tooling you have if the
number of reviews you need is very large then you're still in deep.  So,
if you winnow that by having WG chairs do the requests for things that
are going to be considered (by the WG or for inclusion in a WG charter)
then maybe that is OK.

I am willing to believe that I am chasing daemons that are not there.

I am also betting that the additional work on the part of the chairs is
not much.  And, so, I'm willing to believe that it might be useful to
think about.

(And, I'll also say that I am mostly concerned with IETF documents, not
individual submissions.  If we were to include individual submissions
then the RFC Editor could easily take on the role of "WG chair" and
request review.)

> "No, Brian already has 17 drafts in his review queue, try Mark
> instead."

Actually, probably better to wait on Brian ... :-)

Thanks!

allman


--
Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/