IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Icar] an early review experiment

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 19 May 2004 21:58 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA22399 for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 17:58:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQZ1n-0001f4-OH for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 17:55:09 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i4JLt70f006384 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 17:55:07 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQYiw-0003r9-25 for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 17:35:38 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA19561 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 17:35:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BQYit-0003xu-IP for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 17:35:35 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BQYeD-0003I6-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 17:30:47 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BQYc4-0002oO-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 17:28:32 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQY5e-00033S-Ey; Wed, 19 May 2004 16:55:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQXKL-0001vG-3O for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 16:06:09 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA10213 for <icar@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 16:06:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BQXKJ-0004Tq-9x for icar@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 16:06:07 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BQXJW-0004NA-00 for icar@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 16:05:18 -0400
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BQXId-00049A-00 for icar@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 16:04:23 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A538F622A6; Wed, 19 May 2004 22:03:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01019-06; Wed, 19 May 2004 22:03:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from halvestr-w2k02.emea.cisco.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95614621CB; Wed, 19 May 2004 22:03:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 12:39:27 -0700
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: mallman@icir.org, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc: icar@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Icar] an early review experiment
Message-ID: <183112141.1084970367@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20040519130710.F21BA77AA5C@guns.icir.org>
References: <20040519130710.F21BA77AA5C@guns.icir.org>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--On 19. mai 2004 09:07 -0400 Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> wrote:

>   + How binding are early, cross area review comments on authors /
>     editors / WGs?
>
> I'd like to hear additional opinions on this point.

having been through some 70 reviews in the Gen-ART group, I know very well 
that some review comments are based on misunderstandings, and some only 
point out that the point needs to be better explained... I think that it's 
vital that review comments be *addressed*, but frankly, sometimes the WG or 
the author will be *right*!

(I sometimes miss more intensive arguments from a WG against an AD's 
opinions... I should be careful what I wish for :-)




_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email