IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Icar] independence of reviews; variability

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 09 March 2004 07:20 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA11251 for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:20:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0bXM-0002F8-PW for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:20:25 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i297KOrw008595 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:20:24 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0bXK-0002EY-MK for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:20:22 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA11213 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:20:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0bXH-0000EV-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:20:19 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0bWR-00005w-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:19:27 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0bW0-0007kM-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:19:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0bW1-0001hp-LL; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:19:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0bVN-0001Tf-PS for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:18:21 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA11075 for <icar@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:18:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0bVK-0007js-00 for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:18:18 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0bUP-0007aq-00 for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:17:21 -0500
Received: from joy.songbird.com ([208.184.79.7]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0bTp-0007QY-00 for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:16:45 -0500
Received: from bbprime (jay.songbird.com [208.184.79.253]) by joy.songbird.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i297PFd07254; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:25:15 -0800
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:16:14 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Reply-To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <44347062.20040308231614@brandenburg.com>
To: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
CC: icar@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Icar] independence of reviews; variability
In-Reply-To: <20040309042849.2E00310F4AE@lawyers.icir.org>
References: <17710675617.20040308201158@brandenburg.com> <20040309042849.2E00310F4AE@lawyers.icir.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Mark,

MA> One would really hope that swaying an area director would be roughly the
MA> same as swaying the community.  ...

MA> Of course, I am sure that maybe some ADs have hot-button issues that do
MA> not enjoy IETF consensus.


Since you are asking me a direct question:

Having independent reviews is in line with a community, collaborative
process. It makes the primary force of decision-making come from an
aggregation of comments, and an aggregation of reactions, rather than
from any one person's views or preferences (or even one particular
group's.)

Yes, that might be relevant to the peculiarities of one AD or another,
but it is equally relevant to anyone else's peculiarities.


d/
--
 Dave Crocker <dcrocker-at-brandenburg-dot-com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>


_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email