Re: [Icar] icar futures?
Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Wed, 13 October 2004 19:07 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA25473 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:07:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHoeU-00038g-F4 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:19:10 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CHoJo-0001UX-0z; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:57:48 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CHoD5-000087-1j for icar@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:50:51 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA23668 for <icar@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:50:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from wyvern.icir.org ([192.150.187.14]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHoO5-0002lQ-Bf for icar@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:02:13 -0400
Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-68-76-113-50.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [68.76.113.50]) by wyvern.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9DIogag068509; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:50:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mallman@guns.icir.org)
Received: from guns.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A970477A6E0; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:50:40 -0400 (EDT)
To: Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
Subject: Re: [Icar] icar futures?
In-Reply-To: <20041013184130.GC1128@sbrim-w2k01>
Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR)
Song-of-the-Day: Peaches
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:50:40 -0400
Message-Id: <20041013185040.A970477A6E0@guns.icir.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3
Cc: icar@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1574161006=="
Sender: icar-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d8ae4fd88fcaf47c1a71c804d04f413d
Scott- (our first volunteer reviewer, btw; thanks!) > I still think it's the right idea, I think people are just busy. > Let's poll the wg-chairs and see where they stand. We don't need the > IESG, we can find an initial set of WGs ourselves, eh? Let me play the devil's advocate here... * "people are just busy" I agree. I are such a people. But, if we have to twist people's arms to get them to volunteer to be reviewers, what indication do we have that they will actually do reviews? I know a lot of people whom I could likely cajole onto the list of reviewers, howwver, it is not clear to me that such a path is really the right model. * "we don't need the IESG" I agree that we do not need this bit of help from the IESG to get things started. I think the broader issue here is that the IESG is not enthusiastic about ICAR early review. Is it reasonable to hope to see this sort of thing widely used without some support from the IESG? (Maybe it is... but, I'd like to hear someone argue the point.) On the "poll the wg-chairs" part, I am not sure what you mean. I did attempt to solicit reviewers from the WG chair mailing list. allman -- Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/
_______________________________________________ Icar mailing list Icar@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Spencer Dawkins
- [Icar] icar futures? Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Scott W Brim
- [Icar] Re: icar futures? Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Pekka Savola
- My excuse, and a suggestion [Re: [Icar] icar futu… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Mark Allman
- RE: [Icar] icar futures? Robert Snively
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Alex Rousskov
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Scott W Brim
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Dave Crocker
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Scott W Brim
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Alex Rousskov
- [Icar] Why I haven't signed up for ICAR Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Icar] icar futures? Lucy E. Lynch