IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Icar] Progress?

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org> Tue, 20 April 2004 01:57 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA27746 for <icar-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:57:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFkUs-0008AF-0F for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:56:26 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3K1uPEx031378 for icar-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:56:25 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFkRC-0007VO-Pj for icar-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:52:38 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA27502 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:52:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BFkR9-0002KW-Rc for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:52:35 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BFkQH-00026K-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:51:41 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BFkPr-0001rU-00 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:51:15 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFkLl-0006Wl-ID; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:47:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFkEU-0004nd-Es for icar@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:39:30 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA26966 for <icar@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:39:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BFkER-0006xw-Jr for icar@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:39:27 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BFkDS-0006jr-00 for icar@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:38:27 -0400
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BFkCW-0006IM-00 for icar@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:37:29 -0400
Received: from dfnjgl21 (c-24-1-99-5.client.comcast.net[24.1.99.5]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2004042001365901500r90rce> (Authid: sdawkins@comcast.net); Tue, 20 Apr 2004 01:36:59 +0000
Message-ID: <007a01c42678$04c002c0$0300a8c0@DFNJGL21>
Reply-To: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
From: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
To: <icar@ietf.org>
References: <45741475.20040419100642@brandenburg.com> <20040419172603.3DEBC77A6D5@guns.icir.org> <1768034839.20040419110405@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: [Icar] Progress?
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 20:37:18 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: icar-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc@dcrocker.net>
To: "Mark Allman" <mallman@icir.org>


> Mark,

> >> MA> SIRS didn't get much activity in the grand scheme of things.
> >> I've commented on the tendency to dismiss the SIRS experience
before.
>
> MA> I was not insinuating that it was a failure.  We'd do things
differently
> MA> if we had it to do over.
>
> I'm not so sure.  That would depend on the characteristics of the
> process that one believes should be different.  I do not recall
seeing
> arguments against points of the SIRS structure or in favor of
> alternative designs, that argue for superiority of results.

I may be incorrectly channeling Mark, but I took his comment about
doing things differently as having more to do with not punting after
four months than about changing SIR structure, etc.

Spencer



_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email