IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [iccrg] Adoption of rLEDBAT and LEDBAT++

Daniel Havey <dhavey@gmail.com> Tue, 11 February 2020 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dhavey@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9850120986 for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:27:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kj53wDKLSxWa for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:27:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9033B12098E for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:27:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id 203so7560782lfa.12 for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:27:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+gnVPffS9f2y9BhZr49yzSztRywejmBDLfytRje9quM=; b=oxAX+vYL186czjA+nklVlhkFDyKICml95scCQV95Ftc49ggU7Z+83ibpLotkok3WPb aPlfu0JhtEEWY/5VtftyjPeLFhA0GHYP7HGvifOH2zErSviXB8lHS5PeQ/tSJoWfPVct PuEcGAuTPkNCFYLyyEJ4tRV+RlIvZYIQR1i33dGmdnPm02j7Ft1inwNNSxP9iOmvyehX hr40coX/O3YcGDIKR7RFttAWi9++X67y2coQNI78j6+Nmj8jsT1pzZdcTNeDgEWj2Fum 4E0kWGuZoOhtKjp9adVZyRo8L+XfyLJdYyxoIUOgjN2wM/oMeS9Ptp8QJnGwhe8ZIu2N YbxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+gnVPffS9f2y9BhZr49yzSztRywejmBDLfytRje9quM=; b=pHKHcZymqww/7hu6szivWm479c5IuFqkmwhHl1wLBW12Lkwa1yS1TS/VBsUBsRP6CI 4+FvENkAPUZ19daahHw3L+JUg5y8TmnIr0DIujfxl6wTX5CvH+e1H9GvV34oVjsA6a1e dNdHuzgv8j33t2ki9sfDOlfUTNzTrDtdv3SjeDVWpePD2/F3gxivQR01CJ8T6hfZcsx0 1MynL32N5+QXoghwjYU6uVormBbAqKCIIbPtBINQQvukiH9InbLU+aHkr1LbkPgurEYC TXrr4hUNISKjkvQ0ho9VJOkfB/yMwQOtfHqnj/r9GGmwb0uBaZcPxEM8Qovsa/durBBt CgKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVjivzHiwcFEpzV3IV00kVPGmGTFuoLo2/pFvXj8fEnXmp3SE5z HooCnalWAWgfCsOooxqMJD92UAwMrnTUYcqYvnE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqydke3ddG0zB5GkK/frFqVFmsUeB8DItKdQHCppN+mIwCqgI7tvzTNcOwZ2Xawpmq5avika0/tOs3i/h0Nej4k=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:4849:: with SMTP id v70mr4245070lfa.30.1581442027739; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:27:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACpbDccBj3JKjPLjehgMcR=c5GybL=tF5BaV8k2Z-QGJtjUhJg@mail.gmail.com> <14D70C97-CB81-48A7-9EE1-D00C9FDCA59F@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <14D70C97-CB81-48A7-9EE1-D00C9FDCA59F@ifi.uio.no>
From: Daniel Havey <dhavey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:26:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAO1c0AT7F6-uJN4zdff9Rqo-F8BuPoKAbsLJR=8jP+=zX7CBjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
Cc: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, MARCELO GABRIEL BAGNULO BRAUN <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>, Praveen Balasubramanian <pravb@microsoft.com>, iccrg IRTF list <iccrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004bdefc059e502a17"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iccrg/FRiBJMoqXIrd_ENlAquW-uWOnO0>
Subject: Re: [iccrg] Adoption of rLEDBAT and LEDBAT++
X-BeenThere: iccrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of Internet Congestion Control Research Group \(ICCRG\)" <iccrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iccrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iccrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:27:12 -0000

We actually have plenty of usage. Privacy concerns prevent us from
collecting or reporting on user data but large organizations already rely
on LEDBAT++ to prevent network interference caused by large background data
transport tasks.

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 4:32 AM Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote:

> in favor
> these are very good things to document!
>
> the world is using LBE way too little  :)
>
>
> > On 11 Feb 2020, at 13:23, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > As promised in Singapore, I am proposing adoption of the following
> drafts in ICCRG:
> > LEDBAT++: draft-balasubramanian-iccrg-ledbatplusplus-01
> > rLEDBAT: draft-bagnulo-iccrg-rledbat-01
> >
> > I don't think we need to have a long discussion on process here, and I
> believe we can figure it out as it goes. But I will summarize what I said
> in Singapore. Adoption here simply means that the RG thinks these are
> well-documented solutions to potentially important problems. We expect the
> authors to iterate on the drafts with continuous engagement with the RG.
> Our intent is to only ship documents that have rough consensus.
> >
> > If folks have an opinion on the adoption of either of these documents,
> either in favor or opposing, please respond on this thread. I will close
> this call in about 2 weeks, modulo discussion or opinions opposing adoption.
> >
> > - jana
> > _______________________________________________
> > iccrg mailing list
> > iccrg@irtf.org
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg
>
> _______________________________________________
> iccrg mailing list
> iccrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email