Re: [iccrg] Re BBRv2 Status

Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> Thu, 28 March 2019 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ianswett@google.com>
X-Original-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF289120482 for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZOc-oH1dPiNV for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00EA01204DF for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id w1so23724710wrp.2 for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Sf0s786X5qwsB8/cOuhXGX1vlk6OECfe1eOIhjwYCiQ=; b=gmSlWoV2A0d0LsGzbFBoDDP+xVVSJXj7+aXuT/9/8eRrq0MGpuKG5a+/stVrQhX5RF JJNRA5Ch0SidIzmkbNFTKhq/NI01tUMjZ4Imz66L2e813yO6zYDB2xguMqjP2VC9WvRq 5St+bR5JFINjk1LtRiyqx1YyL6WYv6fybIFE/m6tTUIc8ZU/tW4NCYnGwsGLsGCCKFQK K40XG5f4mK748dPY/h8fYp3P7EH7IT3iiiWyCscqdiwCFqzIVnTN4oH6nsJAti9Qs2Yh /bjz/3PczCa05XrThSBT2haWUcwbO0vefIDSjy/NdknOaABP0DuGIUr+dyAMK7C1BSHb HvSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Sf0s786X5qwsB8/cOuhXGX1vlk6OECfe1eOIhjwYCiQ=; b=OIFw2nsTNqdYRB/e+NaSjfN3FsEEE40cEJgICAARzLc0XLzeJTdFMwQp7mTU1raqKi dkkqk6V0yjGHIeBN7F+x7sbHaGOtxzJYqYT6i5/PLarEcSsuKGzCn3Q9H/qUslRZnyG+ k3DzVxIkICAdll+MiMRYOwjWNXrtzl/ZopeNkE8zvO2o39GnS3iFJR1D9dggQL2lZ0XJ wwvzCCRY/8A+XpFsbYGw7v6EpMDiw2Lw4lzdybwxfsn8r0BIu6XRSidbts24W2sdp7NS 7foJZSNK4y18muLyNYPUqIzcz/uXQ4KRFc7VwP08cav39918l/pyezONPIh1imLLdUye CJxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVmUCG/k6RzrWtVFZQdmT1PvPzqjzR8jnws2OQUH6ebMEvaWMxS jIhgjUOyBK+0IVk4Zqdi0M/Q14TZSwiwWYcMAnt+rA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx3e9xNFJ4k2E4h0A+eHz02Of82lCyPj5ujOAyncSOvpWiVEmYquEfyS7R/UpeNvpb3oxnxtQqVbmStRuFu80I=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:b601:: with SMTP id f1mr11697692wre.158.1553790248312; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BL0PR11MB33946B993A2927E28B6F535190590@BL0PR11MB3394.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CADVnQynvzMzqbM6nNHLAYZ60aLFahBYWFwZpinDqH+pJt5Fvnw@mail.gmail.com> <BL0PR11MB33940E57ADF9966F6B91161B90590@BL0PR11MB3394.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR11MB33940E57ADF9966F6B91161B90590@BL0PR11MB3394.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:23:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKcm_gM+-bHbQCshPyh6uCV8-vQ1EStnNjjhVBLiDHBxx2RXxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Border, John" <John.Border@hughes.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>, "iccrg@irtf.org" <iccrg@irtf.org>, Victor Vasiliev <vasilvv@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cfe02d058529fb55"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iccrg/IRUF3gHiQDEf2XkwWb3vpsUSZzw>
Subject: Re: [iccrg] Re BBRv2 Status
X-BeenThere: iccrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of Internet Congestion Control Research Group \(ICCRG\)" <iccrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iccrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iccrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:24:43 -0000

Yes, user-facing flows(ie: google.com and YouTube).  It is not default
enabled in Chrome yet.  At this point, we may wait or BBRv2.

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:22 PM Border, John <John.Border@hughes.com>
wrote:

>
> Actually, I meant to ask is BBRv1 being used with gQUIC?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 12:12 PM
> To: Border, John <John.Border@hughes.com>
> Cc: iccrg@irtf.org; Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>; Victor Vasiliev <
> vasilvv@google.com>
> Subject: Re: Re BBRv2 Status
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:57 PM Border, John <John.Border@hughes.com>
> wrote:
> >      Is BBRv2 being used with gQUIC at all?
>
> Not yet, but BBRv2 in gQUIC is under active development.
>
> thanks,
> neal
>