IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [iccrg] BBR draft

Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 19 January 2021 04:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B193A1109 for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:15:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ST4IY4KBIKbJ for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:15:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 249383A1101 for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:15:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id j3so686196ljb.9 for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:15:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Fcucm33826hc37W255//NDHqUkV0HtFdCqw4pkFglsA=; b=qJSRDHWKoTq8VDUJZVKEBaFyVnTp4R/mTjIFeRjHHmCfkE7ExLsdoKgM/MW5UtqfhP 2rmvZiY+XnUTj/lAsAZsvH5uEZbQHbXiRWddsMMiwt9SzylTlvibWl6ojSnOXqmBupk9 Nm9V1acPS/E7VMXfF8MsJ5X6HYTAHkF7CYJrs7Baguj/2DXEe9SaXwpbZguAOgx8Gr/V zTL6kcC0fFWEFv/dDJHuuCPtssVoqVRCGkYbiRhPRenjnzDpImsm8ifkqa4uK1vzsMXt BScr4v2xSx1AK6nhrMabBAHIoTaqv6GjhN9XKq0lqyE/HYop24lBhws8w9Q6xxJ0Wprr BynA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Fcucm33826hc37W255//NDHqUkV0HtFdCqw4pkFglsA=; b=VFHIztdKgoP2HOKhfULOeZCM2C84u7HyD3CMSStg63ELIMwVsW5K3qmXusX9O9TaxO ZNkz4eD4FErPceJUJ9nJKPFoAZL0fMBJJCvTnAQgw2VkacKhxjNVg/naz8Bz7uqld68U JHHFgJg3+HGTjVDRDL711B6OIuhFvYfIMnS+8R6K3+F0l3W/+2xdw8XMxMUGmx/EOqy9 ehtXxE6LB5nkIhF3RZUKppilQAjVpUFGHmdh6rdNIUWmtUE0v2GUVLdq/BEewByJDnlS EJMwyA4ulmP1x2G1yJ6gEKUMp+7NAkifVyQRnmHxlMJADcddsfjEgfMH1lN8KYVkYQfx p/Sg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533J6rd1LhDJHAsdaiGTjd7ALObv7g6d8w2EYLWaPcGuWpOhZjgg 82Fs8wlREUO6hlVuzHMbcBJ1Mv+AyyxqgofEjiI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxPF6CJLN1/3GIXCJnlKDz08vsDTx1BnlJNkUziI2zxTS2gftbtsKdZ4trYckgJ12lw5/dpyCZPrVpYwivseOQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:586:: with SMTP id 128mr1095365ljf.273.1611029723928; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:15:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM4esxSVpKb5oaGkNv=UyYKa5Os8UvLCisBdMruCwDEMKHowkw@mail.gmail.com> <CADVnQykrLjKGewbsvoov1f1XtkpKXbKKVXG5P4iFQCLrqfPREQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQykrLjKGewbsvoov1f1XtkpKXbKKVXG5P4iFQCLrqfPREQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:15:13 -0800
Message-ID: <CACpbDcdGK-KeLqT_zc2WcM3MaD-CEyTZJedqc6dEtCc6DRb8yg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, iccrg IRTF list <iccrg@irtf.org>, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006ad9e105b939169f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iccrg/XUw-1J5bMVcU9qopzDfIGFAMjdM>
Subject: Re: [iccrg] BBR draft
X-BeenThere: iccrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of Internet Congestion Control Research Group \(ICCRG\)" <iccrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iccrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iccrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 04:15:28 -0000

FWIW, I'll note that a "draft" can keep evolving as the algorithm evolves.
It's an easier lift than having to go write the whole perfect thing at one
go.

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:59 AM Neal Cardwell <ncardwell=
40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> Yes, we agree with the value of an Internet Draft to document that
> algorithm, and we intend to update the BBR draft to cover BBRv2. However,
> there are currently a few things on our team's to-do list that are in line
> ahead of updating the draft. Primarily, we want to finish tuning the
> algorithm to meet all of our performance targets, so we can finish rolling
> it out for all Google production traffic. Currently BBRv2 is used for the
> vast majority of Google production TCP traffic, but it is not deployed for
> external TCP/QUIC traffic outside of global A/B experiments for a small
> percentage of google.com and YouTube users.
>
> best,
> neal
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:05 PM Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Neal,
>>
>> Is there intent to update the now badly-outdated BBR draft? I know there
>> is open-source code but having something written down in words is very
>> valuable.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Martin
>>
> _______________________________________________
> iccrg mailing list
> iccrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email